Comments on: An Alphabet of Feminism #9: I is for Infant /2010/11/29/an-alphabet-of-femininism-9-i-is-for-infant/ A feminist pop culture adventure Thu, 05 May 2011 11:48:28 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.6 By: Pet Jeffery /2010/11/29/an-alphabet-of-femininism-9-i-is-for-infant/#comment-368 Thu, 05 May 2011 11:48:28 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1126#comment-368 Primary School, when I attended, was divided into Infants School (5-7 years olds) and Junior School (7-11 year olds). Those infants were certainly able to speak!

]]>
By: Katherine /2010/11/29/an-alphabet-of-femininism-9-i-is-for-infant/#comment-367 Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:20:51 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1126#comment-367 In reply to Pet Jeffery.

“No man my age would submit to being called ‘a boy’, for example.”

Actually, I’ve found plenty don’t care, as long as they can still call me a girl. They would only take offense at a MAN calling them a boy.

]]>
By: Hodge /2010/11/29/an-alphabet-of-femininism-9-i-is-for-infant/#comment-366 Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:24:14 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1126#comment-366 In reply to Pet Jeffery.

Ha. Well, I would very much like to squeeze a couple of them myself – am not as organized about what’s coming in the next few weeks as I would like to be!

]]>
By: Pet Jeffery /2010/11/29/an-alphabet-of-femininism-9-i-is-for-infant/#comment-365 Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:37:57 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1126#comment-365 In reply to Hodge.

Ooh! Secrets! Like gift wrapped presents from Auntie Hodge that I can’t even squeeze as yet.

]]>
By: Hodge /2010/11/29/an-alphabet-of-femininism-9-i-is-for-infant/#comment-364 Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:30:22 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1126#comment-364 In reply to Pet Jeffery.

Yeah. I’m counting it as one of the Alphabet’s successes that, as I’m going through, I find the same sort of issues coming back time after time, and thus creating a space for discussion and dialogue about them from lots of different angles. I really hope this is something everyone can engage in.

I’m also sort of mentally pairing words up – with luck, by the end there’ll be a series of different linguistic approaches to several key feminist issues – social, medical, legal, sartorial, sexual, familial etc: infant and girl are obvious allies, but so too, I hope, will be Hysteria, U and O; X and J; S and N… but that’s all a secret :)

]]>
By: Pet Jeffery /2010/11/29/an-alphabet-of-femininism-9-i-is-for-infant/#comment-363 Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:28:49 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1126#comment-363 In reply to Hodge.

So, the sense is that the more infantile women are the lovelier they are? Has anybody written that the more articulate and assertive women are the lovelier they are?

]]>
By: Hodge /2010/11/29/an-alphabet-of-femininism-9-i-is-for-infant/#comment-362 Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:24:57 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1126#comment-362 In reply to Miranda.

Alas for wordcounts. They have never been my friends. This in itself, however, serves the rest of the world a shielding purpose.

]]>
By: Miranda /2010/11/29/an-alphabet-of-femininism-9-i-is-for-infant/#comment-361 Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:16:33 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1126#comment-361 In reply to Hodge.

I’d have let that one in, it made me smile! My dad is the same :)

]]>
By: Hodge /2010/11/29/an-alphabet-of-femininism-9-i-is-for-infant/#comment-360 Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:01:03 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1126#comment-360 In reply to Pet Jeffery.

I had problems with this too. I think the key is that ‘she’s’ is being used as a noun – ‘the loveliest she’ = ‘the loveliest woman’. So then the ‘she’s’ must be ‘[woman] is’ and I assumed that ‘express’d’ meant ‘described as’ or ‘resembling’. ‘And still the more she lives and knows’ – ‘despite the unavoidable knowledge you acquire simply by existing’, ‘the loveliest [type of?] woman is still like a child’. I think.

But I am happy to bow to any superior knowledge, cos it doesn’t *quite* sound perfect…

]]>
By: Hodge /2010/11/29/an-alphabet-of-femininism-9-i-is-for-infant/#comment-359 Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:53:44 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1126#comment-359 In reply to Pet Jeffery.

Ha. That’s funny – in the first draft I had the exact same example: ‘flammable’ was one of my granddad’s pet hates. Sadly had to be removed for reasons of space….

]]>