There is nothing about teeing
‘female’ that naturally
binds women. There is not even such a
state as ‘being’ female,
itself a highly complex category
constructed in contested sexual
scientific discourses and other social
practices. Gender, race, or class
consciousness is an achievement forced
on us by the terrible historical
experience of the contradictory social
realities of patriarchy, colonialism,
and
capitalism.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
The cyborg is an interesting
political metaphor for Haraway,
allowing for the possibility of
connection but resisting the
reductive tendencies of identity
politics. \u00a0‘Woman’
(like ‘Black’ or
‘disabled’ or
‘working class’) is
never a whole identity but a partial
one – individual identities
are made of myriad aspects and
intersecting experiences, part
natural-biological and part
social-cultural construct. Haraway
sees a way through this old problem
of collective action by suggesting a
cyborg feminism which finds its
common ground in a desire to resist
and subvert a patriarchal system and
not in a shared female
identity.<\/div>\n
Haraway famously concludes her
Manifesto with the words
\u201cI\u2019d rather be a cyborg
than a goddess.\u201d I have
nothing against goddesses (on the
contrary, they rawk) but linking
women\u2019s power to nature or to
their bodies is a dangerous
game.<\/div>\n
Alita is radically free from
biological determinism in the
way that only a cyborg can be.
Every part of her is completely
remade or regenerated in the
course of the series, only her
consciousness remains
continuous. She is not her body,
she is not even her brain. Alita
is her memories and her
relationships, her actions and
her
choices.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n