SALT<\/strong><\/a> WAS BORN.\u00a0 True story
– it was written with a bloke in mind for the
title role, but the part ended up in Angelina
Jolie’s bony little hands.\u00a0 And she does
well!\u00a0 She does really well.\u00a0 I say this
quite apart from my love of good old Ange’s
acting – she’s severe, stalwart and
precise, which is exactly what the role needs.<\/p>\n
But you can see the seams where they’ve added
things in or changed things so that the role is
“more suitable for a woman”.\u00a0 There
aren’t many things.\u00a0 Hell, she casts
aside her heels in favour of being barefoot in order
to escape the CIA and make a rocket launcher out of
a table leg and a fire extinguisher.<\/p>\n
But there
are<\/em> things.\u00a0 It’s a shame.\u00a0
Like, at the beginning when, as I said, she makes
a rocket launcher out of cleaning products, spit
and hope – she’s been using the fire
extinguisher to blind the CCTV cameras as she
goes, and when she starts to need that for her
improvised explosive device, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
comes to her brilliant mind, apparently, to cover
the camera in the room
OTHER THAN HER PANTS<\/strong>.<\/p>\n
You heard me.\u00a0 Evelyn Salt, the master of
improvised brilliance and clawing her way out
of a corner, is stumped by the plethora of
chemicals at her disposal and chooses to blind
a camera with her (small, black, lacy)
panties.<\/p>\n
Thanks, film-makers!\u00a0 Because
that’s what women would do, isn’t
it.\u00a0 Let us consider, for a moment, other
(male) action heroes who have used their
underwear to stealth past unwanted
observers.\u00a0 Do you remember that bit in
Assassin’s Creed<\/em> where Altaiir
uses his pants to blindfold a guard so that
he can stab up Robert de Sable?\u00a0 Of
course you don’t!\u00a0 Because he
didn’t.\u00a0 (Presumably because he
was a 12th century Assassin and I’m
not sure if they even
had <\/em>pants).<\/p>\n
If only the Womanification of
Salt’s role had stayed at the
occasional panty shot and her
perplexingly ever-perfect hair.<\/p>\n
Whenever she inflicts bloody violence,
the cinematographic eye watching her is
shaky and squeamish.\u00a0 There’s
a bit, for instance, where she smashes a
bottle and glasses a man to death with
it.\u00a0 All you see of this action is
her<\/em> reaction, on her
face.\u00a0 And some squishy
noises.\u00a0 Let us compare the bit
in
Casino Royale<\/strong> where Bond
smashes a man into a sink until he
dies.\u00a0 It’s gritty, hard,
and completely unflinchingly
filmed.\u00a0 The focus is on
Bond’s actions, rather than
his reaction.\u00a0 In
Salt<\/strong>, the focus is most
definitely on her own reactions to
her violence rather than on the
violence itself.<\/p>\n
Her motivation stinks of
“Oh those crazy, emotional
women and their dependence on
men!” I wish it
didn’t.\u00a0 I really do
wish I didn’t have to tell
you what I do now.\u00a0 I mean,
avoiding detailed spoilers and
all, but Salt’s
entire<\/em> motivation to
ruin the rules that held her
previously was sparked by her
marriage (she married for
love, don’t you
know!).\u00a0 It’s very
ham-fistedly plonked in,
too.\u00a0 It doesn’t
fit with anything else
we’re told about
Salt.\u00a0 It’s like
we’re suddenly expected
to believe that this hardened
motherfucker who’s been
through psychological
programming, torture and worse
is going to go all wounded
vixen over a man.\u00a0
Seriously?<\/p>\n
That said, Salt’s
husband (played by the
eye-meltingly gorgeous
August Diehl, previously
familiar to me as the creepy
uniformed Gestapo officer in
Tarantino’s brilliant
Inglourious
Basterds<\/strong> last
year) fills the role
usually played by women in
this sort of film
perfectly.\u00a0
He’s seen a few
times, doing his thing
(spiders, as it happens:
thanks, Brian!) and
glimpsed in emotional
flashbacks and then
ultimately used as a tool
against Salt.<\/p>\n
But does she really need
this, and just this, to
serve as the sole
motivation for her
actions?<\/p>\n
Would a man?<\/p>\n
I’m not
sure.\u00a0 I’m
still mulling this one
over.\u00a0 From the way
the events pan out, it
looks like she’s
been planning her
defection from much
earlier – but
why<\/em>?\u00a0
There’s no
satisfactory
explanation
given.\u00a0 And
it’s a big
defection – not
just something you
could do on a
whim.<\/p>\n
All that said, it is
a super film, and
there’s a good
chunk of
gender-bending in
it, too.\u00a0 I do
love my gender
bending.\u00a0
Angelina looks
proper smashing as a
bloke.\u00a0 A bloke
in uniform, no
less.\u00a0
Lovely.\u00a0 You
listening,
Hollywood?\u00a0
More like that,
please!\u00a0
Cross-dressing that
isn’t<\/em>
put there for a
cheap laugh!\u00a0
Is it a
first?\u00a0
Possibly not, but
it certainly made
me happy.\u00a0
Also, the fact
that she ends up
with short hair
means that I
wasn’t
distracted and put
off by the
Swinging Curtain
Of Unrealistic
Feminine
Follicular
Perfection.<\/p>\n
YOU SHOULD
SEE THIS FILM
BECAUSE:<\/strong><\/p>\n
\n
-
It’s
fun<\/em><\/li>\n
-
Angelina
Jolie
is
convincing
and
heroic<\/li>\n
-
She
carries
her
own as
practically
the
only
woman
in
this
male-dominated
film
with
gravitas<\/li>\n
-
There’s
SPIDERS<\/li>\n
-
There
will
be
lots
in it
for
you if
you
have a
boner
for
violence<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
YOU
SHOULD
NOT
SEE
THIS
FILM
BECAUSE:<\/strong><\/p>\n
\n
-
Bond
never
twanged
his
pants
at
Scaramanga<\/li>\n
-
Oh
god
I
have
just
had
the
best
idea
for
Bond
fanfiction
ever<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
EDIT<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n
The
author
would
like
to
make
it
clear
that
neither
he
–
nor
his
boyfriend
–
hold
a
negative
view
of
homosexuality.
Apologies
to
readers
who
felt
this
piece
was
written
in
a
way
which
was
open
to
that
interpretation.<\/strong><\/p>\n
This
site
is
a
learning
experience
for
all
of
us,
and
we
hope
you’ll
keep
reading.
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n