{"id":6095,"date":"2011-09-06T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-06T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.badreputation.org.uk\/?p=6095"},"modified":"2011-09-06T09:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-09-06T08:00:00","slug":"revolting-women-the-matchgirls-strike-or-working-class-teenagers-kick-corporate-ass","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/badreputation.org.uk\/2011\/09\/06\/revolting-women-the-matchgirls-strike-or-working-class-teenagers-kick-corporate-ass\/","title":{"rendered":"Revolting Women: The Matchgirls’ Strike (or: Working Class Teenagers Kick Corporate Ass)"},"content":{"rendered":"
This post is part of a series on the theme of women and protest. The full
series is collected under the
tag “Revolting Women”<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n
One of the 19th<\/sup> century\u2019s best-loved stereotypes is that shivering waif,
the Match Girl. Standing in the snow in a tattered shawl and starving to
death in a picturesque way, she is well known to all of us thanks in
large part to Hans
Christian Anderson<\/a>.1<\/a><\/sup> In Victorian
Britain her colleagues worked only slightly less prettily making the
matches in factories under horrific working conditions. Many of them
were girls too, teenagers and children who started work well before
the age of 10.
One famous event which lends these pathetic characters another
dimension and a bit of agency is the Bow Bryant & May match
factory strike of 1888. The broadly accepted chain of events is
this\u2026<\/p>\n
Outspoken socialist, women\u2019s rights campaigner and general
lefty do-gooder Annie Besant<\/strong><\/a> heard a lecture by Clementina
Black<\/a> about the terrible working conditions in Bryant &
May factories. She discovered that the women worked 14 hours a
day for less than five shillings a week, and didn\u2019t often
receive this thanks to a system of fines for offences including
talking, dropping matches or going to the toilet without
permission.<\/p>\n The Bryant & May Factory on
Fairfield Rd, Bow in the 1920s<\/p><\/div>\n
Besant also learnt that the women\u2019s health had been
damaged by the phosphorous used to make the matches, which
caused yellowing of the skin, hair loss and \u2018phossy
jaw\u2019, a jolly name for a particularly gruesome kind of
facial bone cancer.<\/p>\n
Appalled, Besant went to the gates of the factory in Bow the
next day and interviewed some of the women as they were
leaving. Having the stories confirmed, she wrote an article
for her newspaper
The Link<\/strong> with the incendiary title \u2018White
Slavery In London<\/a>‘.<\/p>\n
In response to the bad PR, Bryant & May cleverly
attempted to force their workers to sign a statement that
they were happy with their working conditions. When a
group of women refused to sign, the organisers of the
group were sacked, and the rest of the workforce reacted:
1,400 of the women at Bryant & May went on
strike.<\/p>\n
Cue national uproar. Besant gathered support for her
campaign from a number of prominent figures who all seem
to have had their own newspapers, and they used them to
call for a boycott of Bryant & May matches. The women
at the company formed a Matchgirls’ Union and Besant
agreed to become its leader. After three weeks the company
announced that it would re-employ the dismissed women and
bring an end to the fines system. The sacked women
returned in triumph.<\/p>\n
According to this version of events, Annie Besant
encouraged and led the factory workers to strike for
better conditions. Certainly the identities of the girls
and women involved in the strike have been obscured by
her fame.<\/p>\n The Matchgirls Strike
Committee, and Annie Besant. I don't know who is who
I'm afraid (except Besant, standing,
centre)<\/p><\/div>\n
This Times Higher Ed<\/strong><\/a> review of <Striking a Light: The Truth About the Match Girls
Strike and the Women Behind It<\/strong><\/a>
explains that the matchwomen \u201chave not been
hidden from history but hidden by history\u201d
because the standard account of events very early on
became the go-to example of women\u2019s industrial
action, even to the point of clich\u00e9, so
historians have avoided revising it. Until
now:<\/p>\n
In a careful reconstruction of events, Raw
exposes inaccuracies in the standard accounts
which, while petty, suggest a lazy acceptance of
a chronology that fits the conventional story.
Not only was Besant not the first mover, and she
was probably neither sympathetic to strike
action nor optimistic about its outcome,
preferring instead a boycott of Bryant and
May\u2026 Raw’s revised account has the
match women themselves deciding to strike,
generating leaders and possessing a solidarity
usually denied to unskilled workers of this era,
especially female ones.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
BBC History magazine recorded an interview with
Raw, which is available as a podcast<\/a>.
If you\u2019re at all interested I recommend it.
In the interview she names the five
\u2018ringleaders\u2019 identified by Bryant
& May – Kate Slater, Alice Barnes,
Jane Wakely, Eliza Martin, Mary Driscoll \u2013
and describes newspaper accounts about their
charisma, inspiring speeches and popularity with
the other factory workers. Rather wonderfully,
Raw was able to find out more about these women
after three of their grandchildren approached
her at her talks at the Museum
in Docklands<\/a> and the Ragged
School Museum<\/a>. Local history events
FTW!<\/p>\n
The Matchgirls’ Strike is a landmark in
the history of women and protest, but also in
labour history. It famously inspired the
Dockers\u2019 Strike: the organisers sought
advice from the Matchgirls Union and continually
referenced them in their speeches.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n<\/a>But is there another side to this charming picture of honest
suffering? I’m not saying for a moment that life wasn’t
hellish for the matchgirls, and the rest of the Victorian working
classes. But I welcome any attempt to dig a little deeper than the
hand-wringing waifporn<\/a>
of many contemporary accounts to uncover the experiences and agency of
actual persons.<\/p>\n
Annie Besant<\/h3>\n
<\/a>
Matchwomen<\/h3>\n
<\/a>
BUT WAIT! Where is the pop culture link?<\/h2>\n
\n