{"id":5987,"date":"2011-06-08T09:00:15","date_gmt":"2011-06-08T08:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.badreputation.org.uk\/?p=5987"},"modified":"2011-06-08T09:00:15","modified_gmt":"2011-06-08T08:00:15","slug":"in-defence-of-rihannas-man-down","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/badreputation.org.uk\/2011\/06\/08\/in-defence-of-rihannas-man-down\/","title":{"rendered":"In defence of Rihanna’s ‘Man Down’"},"content":{"rendered":"
Another week, another women-in-music controversy, and another hotly debated
video from Rihanna<\/strong><\/a>. Having ticked domestic
violence<\/a> and sadomasochism
<\/a>off the musical list, she\u2019s responded to recent accusations
<\/a> of being a major player in the oversexualisation of pop by upping the
ante, making her latest offering a blend of sexual violence and violent
retribution. The video for
Man Down<\/strong>, which opens with Rihanna shooting a man who is later
revealed to have assaulted her after they dance at a club, has kicked up a
predictable
<\/a> media
<\/a> dustcloud<\/a>.
It’s all a far cry from ‘Pon de
Replay’<\/a>.<\/p>\n
\u201c\u2018Man Down\u2019 is an inexcusable, shock-only,
shoot-and-kill theme song. In my 30 years of viewing BET, I have never
witnessed such a cold, calculated execution of murder in
primetime…”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
appears to be divorcing the shooting from its context, concentrating
on Rihanna as the agent and perpetrator of a crime, rather than as the
victim of one. This wilfully ignores one of the video’s central
messages, which is the ease with which these roles can be
merged.<\/p>\n
Sex and violence, and sexual violence, as themes in art and
entertainment are as old as art and entertainment themselves. To be
flippant for a second: maybe it’s just the use of the word
\u2018Mama\u2019, but the chorus of ‘Man Down’ put me in
mind of that certain section of Bohemian Rhapsody<\/strong><\/a> where the narrator, having just
killed a man, ruminates on how ‘life had just begun and now
I’ve gone and thrown it all away’. And while I
don\u2019t think Freddie Mercury was ever actively described as a
positive role model, neither was he castigated for encouraging
cold-blooded cod-operatic executions among 1970s youth.<\/p>\n
Is Rihanna coming in for particular criticism because of the
publicity previously given to her real-life encounters with
violence? Those of you following along at home will of course have
noticed that she didn\u2019t respond to her experience of assault<\/a>
by shooting Chris Brown on the concourse of Grand Central Station.
Surely no one seriously believes \u2018Man Down\u2019 to be
advocating that the victims of violence engage in violent
reprisals – any more than that was true of Thelma & Louise<\/strong><\/a>, or Straw Dogs<\/strong><\/a>, or, to really stretch the analogy,
Death and the Maiden<\/strong><\/a>? ‘Man Down’
is, on one level, a revenge fantasy which relies on the
dramatic and the sensational to get its message
across.<\/p>\n
Roger Ebert wrote
of
Irr\u00e9versible<\/strong><\/a>, whose backwards
chronology \u2018Man Down\u2019 recalls, that the
film’s structure makes it inherently moral –
that by presenting the vengeance before the acts that
inspire it, we are forced to process the vengeance
first, and therefore think more deeply about its
implications. Might the same apply to \u2018Man
Down\u2019? Throughout the lyrics and video, the
song’s protagonist may contextualise and explain
her actions, but she’s not free of regret, she
isn’t gleeful or exultant, and she acknowledges
her actions as a crime with implications for the rest of
her life. She calls herself a \u2018criminal\u2019 and
reflects that her rapist and victim was
\u2018somebody\u2019s son\u2019. The narrative
doesn’t glorify murder, but it recognises that we
live in a world where this kind of fantasy-vigilante
approach might often seem more accessible and plausible
than relying for justice on the state or the
police.<\/p>\n
Art and entertainment don’t exist in a vacuum.
Art will be asked to justify itself, particularly when
it touches on themes that are an everyday reality for
many of us and which feed into issues like the space
which women, particularly women of colour, have to
express themselves, and the perpetuation of negative
stereotypes versus the impetus, the desire, and
perhaps the moral duty, to openly discuss the
conditions under which we live.<\/p>\n
The complex intersections of race and gender hardly
lend themselves to being cleared up in the confines of
a blog post, but \u2018Man Down\u2019 has sparked
plenty of engaged and informative discussion online
\u2013 at Crunk
Feminist<\/a>, The
Beautiful Struggler<\/a>, and Hello
Beautiful <\/a> for starters. I’m just glad
debate is happening and that we have a mainstream
artist who doesn’t shy away from instigating
it.<\/p>\n
*<\/p>\n
Rhian Jones also blogs at Velvet
Coalmine<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n