{"id":5468,"date":"2011-09-12T09:00:24","date_gmt":"2011-09-12T08:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.badreputation.org.uk\/?p=5468"},"modified":"2011-09-12T09:00:24","modified_gmt":"2011-09-12T08:00:24","slug":"revolting-women-the-ju-jutsuffragettes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/badreputation.org.uk\/2011\/09\/12\/revolting-women-the-ju-jutsuffragettes\/","title":{"rendered":"Revolting Women: The Ju-Jutsuffragettes"},"content":{"rendered":"
This post is part of a series on the theme of women and protest. The full
series is collected under the
tag “Revolting Women”<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n
My choice of subject for our Revolting Women series was decided the moment
I saw the picture below, an event which caused me to loudly shout
“GET IN!” and do an air-punch with great abandon.<\/p>\n
The lady in this image is Mrs
Edith Margaret Garrud<\/strong> (1872-1971), and she appears to have a
policeman in an armlock.<\/p>\n
It turns out that it’s only an actor playing the hapless bobby,
because Edith is the person responsible for
teaching the Suffragettes jujutsu<\/em>.<\/p>\n
Before we ask how a middle-aged woman in a respectable hat was
able to learn the (then barely discovered) Japanese martial art,
let’s look at why she’d bother:<\/p>\n
We have not yet made ourselves a match for the police, and we
have got to do it. The police know jiu-jitsu. I advise you to
learn jiu-jitsu. Women should practise it as well as men.<\/p>\n
We have got to have [military] drilling in the East End. If
there is any man who has been in the Army or who knows anything
about drilling, will he please communicate with me, and we will
start drilling.<\/p>\n
You should all go out with your sticks [Indian
clubs<\/a> which were popular for exercise at the time, and
easily hidden in clothing]. What is the use of demonstrating for
freedom and going unarmed? Don\u2019t come to meetings without
sticks in future, men and women alike. It is worth while really
striking. It is no use pretending. We have got to fight.
With the recent practice of police using
“kettling” to contain students during anti-cuts
protests, and any (very predictable) resulting violence
against police by the protesters subsequently being loudly
criticised in newspapers, it’s refreshing to see the
sentiments above. ‘Well, we have to learn jujutsu too,
or the police might be able to stop us. And obviously we
can’t have THAT. This is a protest! Get someone who
can make it happen and have him report to me immediately.
Next?’ While the actions may cause debate today, the
sheer ‘nothing will stop us’ attitude is
amazing.<\/p>\n
But Sylvia is not the focus of this post, much as we love
her here on BadRep. It’s Edith who is less well known
but also truly remarkable. She taught PE at a school and
married William, also a PE instructor, when she was 21 and
he 22. They moved to London and met the intriguing Edward
William Barton-Wright, who in 1899 started to teach them
both jujutsu.<\/p>\n
I have to pause again and talk about Barton-Wright, because
England produces a unique brand of truly bonkers things and
he was definitely responsible for one of them which is of
great importance to this narrative.<\/p>\n Stances from Bartitsu, and in the
centre E.W. Barton-Wright and his terrifying moustache.
(Image = Public Domain from Wikipedia)<\/p><\/div>\n
Sherlock Holmes<\/strong>, as well as being a boxer, was
written in a later story as knowing the gentleman’s
martial art of “Baritsu”. This was a
mis-spelling of Barton’s invention, “Bartitsu<\/a>”
(Barton-jujitsu). Asian martial arts weren’t very
widely known in the West before 1900, and he was one of
the first instructors in Europe. It was a time when…
well, when men had moustaches and hats like those in the
accompanying image. Barton-Wright had learned Shinden Fudo
Ryu jujutsu and judo, and developed a new system for
English people of ‘class and bearing’ to use
with dignity (and often a walking stick or
umbrella).<\/p>\n
It was his academy that Edith and her husband attended,
and they both went on to become students of Sadakazu
Uyenishi<\/a> who taught there. When Uyenishi left his
own dojo a few years later, they took over as teachers
of that club in Soho. (Their daughter, Isabel, also
assisted them in running the dojo from 1911 onwards, at
the age of fifteen.)<\/p>\n
Edith was almost certainly the first female jujutsu
instructor in Europe. She and her husband continued
teaching until 1925 – but from 1908 she alone ran
some classes which were only open to
suffragettes.<\/p>\n
And if you thought that Sylvia was a straight-talker in
the quotes above, Edith didn’t hold back either.
There is far, far too much awesomeness going on to fit
it all into this post, so I strongly recommend you read
the pages on the other end of these links:<\/p>\n
In her article “Damsel
Vs Desperado<\/a>” for
Health and Strength<\/strong> magazine in 1910, Edith
said that jujutsu was not just for protesters to use
against police (as the newspapers were gleefully
retelling) but that<\/p>\n
Woman is exposed to many perils nowadays, because
so many who call themselves ‘men’ are
not worthy of that exalted
title.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
She then goes on to write a short story (with
illustrations!) about a woman being attacked while
“returning home along a lonely country
road.” It contains lines such as:<\/p>\n
Believing that he has had enough by now and that
she has shown him what she can do, she gives him
a severe twinge that makes him fairly squeal,
and throws him off as a “thing”
beneath contempt.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
It was this magazine which came up with the
title “Ju-jutsuffragettes”, one
which Edith seemed to quite like, and in 1911
they printed another article describing a short
sketch also written by her, in which a wife
defends herself against her violently drunk
husband. The headline proudly announced
“I’ll learn this ‘ere jucy
jujubes, Liz, for I could do for you if I was
sober,” he says.
The reminder that domestic violence was (and
is) widespread enough to make the play
relevant to the audience is chilling,
however.<\/p>\n
What makes Edith of particular importance to
the protest movement she was part of is not
just that she was a suffragette, or taught
others to take on police during protests, but
that she trained the 30 women known as
“The Bodyguard”. This group was
set up to prevent the frequent arrest of top
suffragette protesters (the police would
release those who were on hunger strike and
then quickly
re-arrest them<\/a>). As well as pitched
hand-to-hand fighting between ladies and Her
Majesty’s constabulary, the Bodyguard
used disguises, decoys and all sorts of other
tricks to get the known leaders away after a
protest. For many years, she was their chief
trainer.<\/p>\n
I ordered a copy of a charming book by Tony
Wolf called “Edith Garrud: The suffragette who knew
Jujutsu<\/strong><\/a>“. It’s
one of the most fully-researched works on
the woman and her deeds, but is written for
children, leading to sentences such as
‘The Police, of course,
didn’t like the idea of the
Suffragettes’ new Bodyguard society
one little bit.’<\/em> It also
provides some amazing quotes and stories:
during one public demonstration, a
reporter from the Daily Mirror was invited
to attack the 4’11” Edith on
stage. After trying several attacks and
being roundly thrown or wristlocked each
time, he wrote of his experiences in an
article for the newspaper:<\/p>\n
I rose convinced of the efficiency of
Jujutsu, and, aching in every limb,
crawled painfully away, pitying the
constable whose ill-fortune it should
be to lay hands on Mrs.
Garrud.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Again and again in her story we see
parallels to the student and anti-cuts
protests earlier this year. The
suffragettes knew that property damage
meant headlines, but there were
generally strict boundaries – no
people were to be hurt, and no factory
or other workplace was to be damaged
where people’s jobs would be
affected. One incident Edith was
involved in was a gathering of women
on Oxford Street, who, when Edith blew
a whistle, pulled hammers and rocks
from under their clothes and threw
them through shop windows. This was
seen as a logical, necessary and
entirely justified action which had a
place in protest, not just empty
vandalism, and she defends it
eloquently. Newspapers and blogs are
still having that debate today.<\/p>\n
She presented a suffragette petition
to Lloyd George, who started to argue
with her. Edith replied “Now
then, you are dealing with a fellow
countrywoman from the Welsh Valleys.
Be sensible, man!” (She was born
in Bath but grew up in Wales). They
then had entirely civil conversations
on more than one occasion, although
never agreed on ideals.<\/p>\n Edith
depicted in the July 1910 edition of
Punch magazine.<\/p><\/div>\n
In an interview for
Woman<\/strong> magazine when she
was 94, she said that
self-discipline had been the key to
jujutsu and protest –
discipline of the body, but much
more of the mind. Even at that age
she presented as someone with
unbending levels of determination.
Reading about women’s voices
in protest then and now, the
difference comes over as a
directness in attitude: of being
entirely sure that your cause is
just and that you must therefore do
everything to help protest succeed.
The conversation in those circles
would be “So the police are
using kettling and
‘pre-emptive arrests’ to
suppress dissent. How do we make
sure those techniques
never work on us
again?<\/em>”<\/p>\n
Edith Garrud died in 1971 at the
age of 99. She was instrumental
in teaching the suffragettes the
skills they used to evade
capture and speak in public for
longer. She also broke new
ground in being a woman who
taught martial arts only
recently discovered in Europe to
women. This year, Edith will be
honoured
with a permanent memorial by
Islington council<\/a> –
an ‘Islington
People’s Plaque’
– because she won a public
vote to be one of the five
people or places thus
celebrated.<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n
\n– Sylvia Pankhurst, quoted
in the New York Times<\/a> on Aug 12th 1913, shortly before
she was arrested.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
<\/a>
\n“Ju-Jutsu
as a Husband-Tamer: A Suffragette Play with a
Moral<\/a>“(!) The photos are brilliant (I
am all too familiar with the wrist-lock in no.4,
ouch) and the short script contains some
comedy:<\/p>\n
\n“No,” answers Liz;
“you’re a good husband to me then,
and wouldn’t want to, but when
you’re drunk I’ll always be a
match for you.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
<\/a>