![\"A](\"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/www.badreputation.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/08\/fringe_dreamscape-e1285197987858.jpg\")
<\/a>FRINGE: Olivia and Nina Sharp talk about boys. ...No, wait. \u00a92008 Fox Broadcasting Co. Cr: Barbara Nitke\/FOX<\/p><\/div>\n
I’ve been thinking about the Bechdel Test recently, and it’s something which has come up frequently in the comments on this site. For those who don\u2019t know, this is a test which rates a movie by whether it has:<\/p>\n
-
\n
- At least two women in it<\/li>\n
- Who talk to each other<\/li>\n
-
About something other than a man<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Now let\u2019s face it, this shouldn\u2019t be difficult. It actually doesn\u2019t go very far – it’s entirely possible to write a movie which passes but is in no way “feminist”, or is even actively misogynist. It’s very important not to overestimate Bechdel. It tells you nothing about the tone, content or values of a film.<\/p>\n
But it does prove that there are two women, and they talk about something other than men. That has value, in an industry where the pass rate for movies is truly pathetic.<\/p>\n
Some of the reasons for this low pass rate are actually more about lazy narrative structure than lazy sexism. Far too often if a conversation between two women happens, it still fails because it is only about the lead character, who is a man. In order to maximise tension and pace, all small talk not relating to explosions or imminent danger is cut from the script. (Sadly it\u2019s more often replaced with \u201cI hope hero-man X can save us!\u201d. Even today, it\u2019s ridiculous how much this happens.)<\/p>\n
Network TV suffers from this more than cinema because in most television the lead character MUST, MUST be a white male. Must. No negotiation. Must. If you deviate from this, you are That Brave Show with the Alternative Lead<\/em>, and some other stuff that no-one pays as much attention to as the fact you have an Alternative Lead. Some movies are pushing the boundaries, but the US networks generally refuse to.<\/p>\n
So I\u2019m going to talk briefly about TV shows instead of the usual movies. TV science-fiction is a genre which usually scores pathetically badly in particular, so let\u2019s take a series from there which Does It Right:<\/p>\n
Fringe. <\/strong>(Minor spoilers to follow!)<\/p>\n
Olivia Dunham, a female FBI agent, investigates paranormal events with the aid of a genius, his insane father, another female FBI agent and occasionally some very recognisable beloved genre actors.<\/p>\n
Even here there are problems. The biggest one is that she\u2019s arguably not the main character anymore: the show provided such a rich story for the insane father (and to be fair, an absolutely astonishing actor) that he’s nearer the centre of the show.<\/p>\n
But it certainly does pass the Bechdel test. Olivia frequently speaks to her female colleague, her sister and various others on work and personal matters. Although she\u2019s quite unemotional about many things (due to trust issues and a twisted childhood), a lot of the screen time is on her experience as a woman in her role. The character is sympathetic and far from two-dimensional.<\/p>\n
Much more impressive (and one point which really raised the series) is the episode where she is kidnapped and the male leads are racing to save her from several armed thugs.<\/p>\n
But they don\u2019t need to, because she\u2019s an FBI agent<\/em> – she promptly frees herself and beats the living crap out of everyone nearby, escapes and phones it in. Because female agents are armed and trained professionals, not princesses in a tower.<\/p>\n
True, it\u2019s another case of a woman excelling by acting in ways traditionally associated with male aggression. Proving they can punch people in the face as hard as men can is NOT the same as depicting realistic female lives on TV. Similarly in politics, being more aggressive, intolerant and eager for war than the male Hawks isn\u2019t the way to be an inspiration for women – it just means there\u2019s another right-wing patriarchal asshole in the room, and the world has enough of those. But in this case, Dunham\u2019s principles are so strong and her courage so constant that the show is very clearly about her being a competent agent and a woman in the FBI… without her gender ever marking her out as special. She isn’t cut any slack by her bosses, and isn’t expected to react differently under pressure. Olivia naturally starts as the focus and no-one ever reacts to it as being unusual.<\/p>\n
Female leads in action movies are still a hot issue. Elsewhere on the site we’ve had a blogpost on the movie “Salt”, which got made because Angelina Jolie can do anything the hell she wants<\/em> in Hollywood, and they\u2019re already reassured that she can handle guns and car chases. But the press were astonished at the idea of a woman playing a role which had been written for a male spy.<\/p>\n
I would dearly love to see something that has a truly interchangeable lead. A fully-rounded character with opinions and instincts, but one which could be equally played by a man or a woman. What would be really interesting is \u201cPerson X has a love interest Y, and doesn\u2019t get on with their ex, Z\u201d. Now roll some dice to decide which gender everyone is.<\/p>\n
For me, Bechdel isn’t the point. It proves itself, and is therefore a useful barometer for how female roles are being treated across the industry, but it doesn’t tell you about the movie or show. Fringe goes way beyond it, and the interesting parts about Fringe aren’t described by the pass\/fail: the female characters are SO strong that it’s the struggle of wills between Olivia and Nina that is really behind the drive to reveal or cover the truth, not the men.<\/p>\n
For example, another TV show which passes the test (but this time just barely) is the unashamedly cowboy-centred modern police story Justified<\/strong><\/a>.\u00a0 At one point it has the main character\u2019s current lover and ex-wife talk to each other, but naturally includes him as a subject of the conversation. Given their romantic connection to him and the tension between them right at that moment which comes from it, it\u2019s not an ignorant fail on the part of the writers. It would be bizarre for him not<\/em> to be a topic of conversation… but this example is typical of the few times that two women talk to each other in a lot of movies and TV.<\/p>\n
Does the TV series feature at least two named <\/em>female characters…<\/p>\n
-
\n
- Who talk to each other<\/li>\n
- About something other than 1) a man or 2) the immediate danger they themselves are in<\/li>\n
-
And does it do this
at least once every 5
episodes<\/em>?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
(One occurrence in a 23-ep run or over several series does not deserve to pass the test, frankly.)<\/p>\n
Are there any good shows out there? Any absolute stinkers? Is the action \/ tension so constant and high in modern tv that characters MUST talk about the male lead all the time, because all other spare time involves dodging explosions?<\/p>\n