{"id":20,"date":"2010-10-12T09:00:44","date_gmt":"2010-10-12T08:00:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.badreputation.org.uk\/?p=20"},"modified":"2010-10-12T09:00:44","modified_gmt":"2010-10-12T08:00:44","slug":"the-bottom-rung-of-the-ladder","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/badreputation.org.uk\/2010\/10\/12\/the-bottom-rung-of-the-ladder\/","title":{"rendered":"The Bottom Rung of the Ladder"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/strong><\/p>\n

We not only have to survive, we have to deserve to survive. <\/strong>
\n– Joss Whedon<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Whedon was talking about how characters make hard decisions in Battlestar Galactica<\/strong>, but the same sentiment is reflected in lines from his \u201cEquality Now<\/a>\u201d speech:<\/p>\n

Equality is not a concept. It\u2019s not something we should be striving for. It\u2019s a necessity. Equality is like gravity, we need it to stand on this earth as men and women – and the misogyny that is in every culture is not a true part of the human condition. It is life out of balance, and that imbalance is sucking something out of the soul of every man and woman who\u2019s confronted with it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

These two quotes sum up why I\u2019m a feminist. Equality is not optional. I\u2019m intelligent enough, and live in a society educated enough, that there is no excuse for me not to aim for it. Without equality, we fail as human beings.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

From Planet of the Apes, 1968. (Stop complaining about spoilers, you've had 40 years.)<\/p><\/div>\n

This type of \u201cequality\u201d is not some iron-clad regulation of behaviour, but an equal chance to live as you choose to: not to be disadvantaged because assumptions are made about one of two categories (which don’t match the multiple physical or mental possibilities anyway). Not pressured to act a certain way, or locked out from having power over your life. And it’s not some unimportant dream of abstract perfection but the most fundamental part of the lives of millions.<\/p>\n

Reaching this fabled Equality won\u2019t solve many problems. Those people lucky enough to escape poverty will still need to work every day, death is still inevitable, resources are still finite. If we had a much-reduced need for feminism, we\u2019d only be starting<\/em> on the struggle for a better society – but we wouldn\u2019t be dooming over half our population to lesser chances and consideration because they don\u2019t have man-parts.<\/p>\n

Of course, aiming for true equality and overcoming the prejudices which are deeply ingrained in our (somewhat twisted) upbringings is difficult even for feminists. I wonder whether giving up my seat on the train for a woman is deeply offensive and sexist, because it\u2019s based on the idea that women are weak creatures to be treasured and looked after by big strong men. I start to examine every single decision I make<\/em> that is based on the line \u201cbecause she\u2019s a woman\u201d. In a society where equality was real, that reason would virtually never apply.<\/p>\n

For most roles, if gender is the only difference between two people then they should be interchangeable. A decision should immediately be about the positives and negatives of the individual instead. By having true equality, you would be free to see the person for who they are \u2013 at the very least, THEY would be free to choose who they are without having it dictated because of what society thinks \u201cwomen\u201d are\/deserve this year.<\/p>\n

But instead girls still get pink dolls and boys get blue trucks.<\/p>\n

It’s not unrealistic to have true equality as the eventual aim. In fact, it makes identifying the current inequality all the easier: endless shelves of women’s magazines full of airbrushed anorexics, and also full shelves of men’s mags featuring topless women all with identical body shapes… if we were surrounded by constant images of perfectly-toned half naked men with impossible airbrushed bodies on every second billboard and magazine cover instead, you have to wonder how long this shit would last.<\/p>\n

Mark Thomas (the political comedian) released a “People’s Manifesto<\/strong><\/a>” earlier this year. It was made by his audiences volunteering their ideas for new British laws. My favourite reads:“Models to be selected at random from the electoral register”.<\/em><\/p>\n

Male, female, young, old. Large, small. All races, all shoes sizes, glasses-wearing NORMAL PEOPLE modelling clothes for normal people.<\/p>\n

Of course, his show is supposed to be a comedy.<\/p>\n

Going this far into the idea of a culture where we truly don\u2019t dictate gender roles is not Joss Whedon\u2019s point at all, and not really my main one either. We\u2019re not there. We\u2019re not even 10% of the way there. We\u2019re in a world where we still have to campaign to stop female genital mutilation in England<\/em>. Where large parts of the planet treat over 50% of human beings as property, or as unclean, dangerous sexual objects.<\/p>\n

\"This

A feminist, yesterday. (Photo of Bill Bailey from http:\/\/www.fawcettsociety.org.uk)<\/p><\/div>\n

The term ‘Feminism’ has a bad rep with a lot of men. When I linked to this site from my blog, one of the commenters said they found the idea of male feminists “somewhat absurd”. That’s light compared to the reception they receive in some places online.<\/p>\n

Bad Rep <\/strong>believes that we’re not going to make much change by refusing to engage with 49% of the population on principle, so this last bit is aimed at male readers:<\/p>\n

Men! Do not be afraid! Not only are you welcome here, but you probably already agree with everything feminism stands for:<\/p>\n

A feminist is a person who answers “yes” to the question, “Are women human?”<\/strong> Feminism is not about whether women are better than, worse than or identical with men. … It’s about women having intrinsic value as persons rather than contingent value as a means to an end for others: fetuses, children, the “family,” men.
\n– Katha Pollitt<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Or more succinctly:<\/p>\n

Feminism is the radical notion that women are people.<\/strong>
\n– Cheris Kramarae, Paula A. Treichler, Ann Russo: A Feminist Dictionary<\/strong>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Equality is not optional. It is the only way we can get to the very first step of the ladder that creates a society to be proud of, and leave a record of the human race which doesn\u2019t mark us as worse than the apes we came from. It’s not ‘absurd’ to have everyone involved – men need<\/em> female equality to be in place before we can truthfully call ourselves men.<\/p>\n