{"id":1666,"date":"2013-06-03T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2013-06-03T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.badreputation.org.uk\/?p=1666"},"modified":"2013-06-03T13:37:30","modified_gmt":"2013-06-03T12:37:30","slug":"v-is-for-virgin-alphabet-b-sides-and-rarities","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/badreputation.org.uk\/2013\/06\/03\/v-is-for-virgin-alphabet-b-sides-and-rarities\/","title":{"rendered":"V is for Virgin (Alphabet b-sides and rarities)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Hodge-note:<\/strong> This rather special item from the archives was originally #22 in the Alphabet series<\/a>, and got mostly written (and illustrated) before I heard the siren song of\u00a0vitriol<\/strong> instead, with its rich murder and rage connotations. Vitriol<\/strong><\/a> was duly inducted into the Alphabet official rankings and\u00a0Virgin<\/strong> languished like a vestal until we thought maybe she should see the light of day…<\/p>\n

Here she is:<\/p>\n

V<\/h6>\n

VIRGIN<\/h2>\n

And your quaint honour turn to dust
\nAnd into ashes all my lust…<\/p>\n

Andrew Marvell, To His Coy Mistress <\/strong>c.1640s<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Virgin<\/em> has a comparatively straightforward etymology: it derives from the Latin virgo <\/em>(= ‘maiden’), whence the star-sign Virgo (apparently the sign of the shy, modest and meticulous, with a dash of perfectionism and anxiety). Its first sense (c.1200) is an ecclesiastical one: ‘an\u00a0unmarried or chaste maiden or women, distinguished for piety or steadfastness in religion, and regarded as having a special place among the members of the Christian church on account of these merits.’<\/p>\n

Like a virgin<\/h2>\n
\"Saint<\/a>

Saint Lucy, with her eyes, as depicted in 1521<\/p><\/div>\n

There are innumerable such virgins in Christian hagiography: Saint Ursula had an army of 11,000 virgin handmaids who all had their heads chopped off (in a bit of a pun-fail); Saint Cecilia (patron saint of music) managed not only to persuade her husband to forbear on their wedding night, but also to join the Christian cause along with his brother, and suffer death in consequence.<\/p>\n

Saint Lucy consecrated her virginity to God, and, supposedly, tore her own eyes out and gave them to her husband (who had admired them) as a kind of macabre substitute for the marital debt. (Lesson: never admire your girlfriend’s essential organs).<\/p>\n

And, of course, there is the arch-virgin much mentioned in these posts \u2013 the eponymous Mary, who gets a definition all to herself as\u00a0virgin<\/em>‘s fourth meaning.<\/p>\n

Mary’s particular achievement – the Virgin Birth – is also considered of some importance in these definitions for virgin<\/em>. It presumably lies behind the gloss ‘a female insect producing fertile eggs<\/a> by pathenogenesis [without the input of a male insect]’ (1883), as well as virgin<\/em>‘s\u00a0simple equivalence with ‘pathenogenesis’ itself (1849) – a word with its origin in the Greek parthenos<\/em>, also meaning ‘virgin’ and ‘genesis’ (= ‘creation’).<\/p>\n

This – reproduction without\u00a0fertilisation\u00a0– though clearly associated with Mary in Christian tradition, is also arguably the origin of Adam, so it doesn’t have to be have an\u00a0explicit cultural gender-association. Indeed, there is a Middle English citation for\u00a0virgin\u00a0<\/em>that defines it as\u00a0‘a youth or man who has remained in a state of chastity’. But this is admittedly an unusual example among the definitions as a whole.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

A woman’s touch<\/h2>\n
\"Roman<\/a>

A Vestal Virgin<\/p><\/div>\n

If we go back to ancient Rome, we meet another sense the religious meaning of\u00a0virgin<\/em> can\u00a0have: the very non-Christian\u00a0Vestal Virgins<\/a>, a group of highly respected women whose job it was to guard the ‘sacred fire’ and take care of the rituals and responsibilities that could not be dealt with by male priests.<\/p>\n

They were so named because their duties were primarily to Vesta, the Roman goddess of the hearth and family, and, in consequence, the Vestal Virgins took on a role as kind of symbolic housewives to the whole of Rome.<\/p>\n

Though they would be obliged to remain virginal <\/em>throughout their time as priestesses, in the word’s second sense ‘a woman who is or remains in a state of inviolate chastity’, the vow only lasted thirty years, at the end of which they were free to marry (though most of them seem not to have been all that bothered).<\/p>\n

This all said, while these saints and priestesses are all very much virgins <\/em>in the most common sense of the word, the ecclesiastical meaning\u00a0does not have to imply the sexual inexperience they normally connote, since ‘chastity’ simply means ‘clean, pure’ (from the Latin castus<\/em>), and has no intrinsic connection with physical ‘intactness’, though it is frequently used as a synonym. In fact, the fourth definition for the second primary meaning of the word (where it can be used to describe things other than women) highlights ‘purity or freedom from stain’ and being ‘unsullied’.<\/p>\n

If you cast your mind back to ‘M is for Marriage<\/a>‘, you may remember that adultery <\/em>means ‘pollution of the marriage bed’, suggesting by association that the marriage bed was a sacred \u2013 or indeed ‘pure’ \u2013 space. And indeed, marriage was widely considered invalid without consummation \u2013 something Henry VIII made much use of in his royal divorces <\/a>\u2013 and, in consequence, the virtuous wife who\u00a0dexterously\u00a0trod the balance of Pure Marital Sex and Pollution of the Marriage Bed (whether by adultery as we conceive it, or by lusting after her husband) could be as much feted as the unmarried virgin <\/em>(indeed, more so, if she proved herself skilled in housewifery and produced equally virtuous children).<\/p>\n

\"Elizabeth<\/a>

The ‘sieve portrait’ of Elizabeth I, 1583<\/p><\/div>\n

That said, a curious and related term first cited in 1644 was\u00a0virgin widow<\/em>, meaning a woman whose husband had died before the marriage could be consummated, and whose status was therefore ambiguously poised between\u00a0virginity\u00a0<\/em>(in the sense of being unmarried) and\u00a0widowhood\u00a0<\/em><\/a>(being left behind after the death of a husband).<\/p>\n

This was\u00a0Catherine of Aragon<\/a>‘s position, as argued at her divorce hearing, during the painful period \u00a0after Prince Arthur’s death – languishing in a political and social limbo, waiting for something to happen, steadily running out of money and losing points on the marriage market.<\/p>\n

Purity is a virtue of the soul<\/h2>\n

An excellent, though somewhat horrific, example of the noble wife trope is Lucretia<\/a>, the virtuous spouse of Collatine, whose rape by the royal prince Tarquin so outraged Rome that it led directly to the establishment of the Roman republic. As a wife, Lucretia is not a technical\u00a0virgin<\/em>, but she is (as Shakespeare puts it in the oft-forgotten early poem The<\/strong>\u00a0Rape of Lucrece\u00a0<\/strong>(1594)) ‘Collatine’s fair love, Lucrece the chaste<\/em>‘.<\/p>\n

Saint\u00a0Augustine<\/a> posits that ‘purity is a virtue of the soul<\/a>‘, and since body and soul are (in this reading) distinct, Lucrece can consummate her marriage while still retaining her essential ‘bodily sanctity’ because she is free of polluting lust in the process.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, Collatine spends so much time bragging about his wife’s chastity to the bros in the camp that he invites trouble:<\/span><\/p>\n

Haply that name of “chaste” unhapp’ly set
\nThe bateless edge on [Tarquin’s] appetite<\/p>\n

Shakespeare,\u00a0The Rape of Lucrece<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Lucretia is so traumatised by Tarquin’s subsequent rape that she stabs herself rather than ‘live impure’, widely considered by the (male) world to be a Noble Decision. This led to her immortalisation in literature and philosophy as a perfect wife, but also prompted Augustine to engage in some terrible rape apologism in the service of his broader argument (<\/span>‘If she\u00a0was adulterous, why praise her? if chaste, why slay her?’).<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

Saints and sieves<\/h2>\n

It is presumably a version of this chastity-of-the-soul idea so beloved by Augustine that lies behind the story of Tuccia, the Vestal Virgin who proves her virginity by carrying water from the Tiber in a sieve without spilling a drop (here she is <\/a>depicted in 1555\u00a0with the sieve itself, and wearing an outfit that leaves little to the imagination, chaste or otherwise).<\/p>\n

I suppose the idea behind the sieve story is that something that would normally flow through the porous surface is maintained ‘intact’, perhaps representing the pure soul within a porous body. At any rate, it became a key symbol of virginity, most notably in the ‘Sieve Portrait’ of the\u00a0‘Virgin Queen<\/a>‘ Elizabeth I, who is also cited in the Dictionary as a definition of virgin\u00a0<\/i>in herself.<\/p>\n

The last citation given in the dictionary for virgin<\/em>, with which we will end, is from 1780, as ‘a fortress or city that has never been taken or subdued’. This has an obvious resonance with Lucrece, and the ultimately martial tale her story becomes – another link between\u00a0feminine ‘closedness’ and men’s military convenience.<\/p>\n

It’s hard to find a way to re-appropriate any of these ideas in a positive way. But maybe this transferred definition or fortresses and cities should make us think about Elizabeth I, who at least made them work to her own military and political advantage.<\/p>\n

\"A<\/a><\/p>\n