{"id":1445,"date":"2011-02-21T09:00:03","date_gmt":"2011-02-21T09:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.badreputation.org.uk\/?p=1445"},"modified":"2011-02-21T09:00:03","modified_gmt":"2011-02-21T09:00:03","slug":"an-alphabet-of-femininism-19-s-is-for-ship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/badreputation.org.uk\/2011\/02\/21\/an-alphabet-of-femininism-19-s-is-for-ship\/","title":{"rendered":"An Alphabet of Feminism #19: S is for Ship"},"content":{"rendered":"
S<\/h6>\n

SHIP<\/h2>\n

Q: Why are ships refered to in the female gender?<\/strong><\/p>\n

A:<\/strong> – The only beautiful lines to match a ship would be that of a beautiful woman.
\n– When we crusty mariners go to sea we want a way to honor our loved ones left on shore.
\n– Unless the grew is different they name them after girls. Besides they all have issues & a mind of there own. And cost a fortune to keep going.
\n– Because they are always wet at the bottom!
\n– Because the are grace full and slander also very majestic.\u00a0Just like my woman.
\n– Because we love our boats like our women.
\n– Because they need handling very very carefully!<\/p>\n

Yahoo Answers <\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

OK, you got me. My finely-honed research techniques generally begin with asking Google. Believe it or not, this timeless question: ‘why is a ship called “she”?’ seems to have eluded people for quite a while \u2013 along with this Yahoo Answers page, I also consulted\u00a0this tea-towel<\/a> in a Greenwich gift-shop and asked my old friend, the dictionary. Nary a satisfactory (read: academic) answer. But let this not stop us \u2013 onwards!<\/p>\n

\"Saucy<\/a>

Saucy Nancy takes a bath - illustration by John Harwood<\/p><\/div>\n

We know ship <\/em>is probably Old English (scip<\/em>) but its ultimate etymology is officially ‘uncertain’. The Online Etymology Dictionary<\/a> (whence I have had frequent recourse since my alma mater saw fit to strip me of my free OED online access) considers it to be proto-Germanic (skipen<\/em>), ultimately from ‘skei<\/em>‘ = ‘to cut, split’ \u2013 now, now, let’s not get bawdy in our quest for gendering answers, it’s easily explained as ‘a tree cut out’: Literal, man. This gives us its first meaning, as ‘a\u00a0large sea-going vessel’, as opposed to a smaller boat<\/em>. In modern times, this means specifically ‘a vessel having a bowsprit and three masts, each of which consists of a lower top and topgallant mast’.<\/p>\n

These may not be specifically gendered, but by the 1550s people were widely referring to an unsailed ship as a maiden<\/em> and its initial outing as a maiden voyage <\/em>(an adjectival form of the proto-Germanic magadinom = <\/em>‘young womanhood; sexually inexperienced female’). Of course, this was a trend appropriated in the sky-crazy 1960s to apply to aircraft and other heavy vehicles, and it is still widely used today \u2013 with many of its superstitions intact (and possibly justified… don’t know if anyone’s heard of RMS Titanic <\/em>at all?)\u00a0The word also has figurative uses and associations: ‘ship of the desert<\/em>‘, meaning ‘a camel’; and a ghostly ‘Guinea ship<\/em>‘, which is a sailor’s term for a floating medusa<\/a>.<\/p>\n

I always say it’s the uniform Shirley’s fallin’ for…<\/h3>\n

Ah, sailors. Perhaps I’m generalizing here, but they have not been widely celebrated for their feminist views. Their superstitions on the other hand \u2013 well, those are another matter. Along with Fear Of Maiden Voyages, these also include the belief that having a woman on board was unlucky (the sea would get Angry and Wreak Revenge) and that if a bare-footed female crossed your path on your way to sea you should not get on board (let the lads scoff, you weren’t planning on dying anytime soon). Daughters of Eve were to be kept away from maiden ships<\/em> in particular at all costs: barren women were simply dying to jump over the keel in the name of fertility, with nary a care for the lives of the carpenters and captain they were endangering in the process.<\/p>\n

\"A<\/a>

It's for warding off danger, sir, honest... Image via Flickr user r3v || cls<\/p><\/div>\n

In fact, the closest a woman should ever come to a ship <\/em>in Days of Yore\u00a0was in the form of a bare-breasted apparition (get your tits out, love): such visions would calm gales and rough seas \u2013 although this one does rather sound like it was made up by a singularly hopeful sailor down the club of a saturday night \u2013 and they possibly explain why so many figureheads <\/em>seem to have mislaid their t-shirts<\/a>. What’s that you say? Figureheads? These are carved decorations sitting astride the prow, most common on ships between the sixteenth and nineteenth centuries (eventually abandoned because they had grown to such a size that they impeded the vessel’s smooth progress). When they were not effigies of naked women, they generally had something to do with the name of the vessel in question, as with London’s replica of the\u00a0Golden Hind<\/strong><\/a> (or indeed the\u00a0Golden Behind<\/a>, led by Captain Abdul and his pirate crew in another of my childhood favourites). Their function, then, could be to identify the ship, ward off supernatural danger or simply to look pretty, in a kind of early version of the pin-up page three \u2013 in most cases, they probably fulfilled a mixture of these services.<\/p>\n

Their relationships with the sailors manning the vessel could vary: they were almost certainly endowed with some kind of spiritual protective power<\/a> \u2013 we must not forget how perilous a sea voyage remained even into the twentieth century \u2013 but they were presumably also viewed with all the Manly Affection evidenced in respondents to Yahoo Answers. After all, there’s a reason a sailor has a girl in every port, and a comparative pendant might be that iconic pin-up image of Betty Grable<\/a> marketed at American GIs in 1943 (or indeed the retro-appeal of Sexy Sailor underwear<\/a>). The much-underrated XTC<\/a> exploited this in their eighties-tastic music video for All You Pretty Girls<\/strong><\/a> (1984) (which contains the immortal line ‘in my dreams we are rocking in a similar motion’).<\/p>\n

…He won’t look so la-di-dah in a suit of dungarees.<\/h3>\n

But an enjoyable analogue to this tradition is the tobacco-chewing, slang-spouting, landlubber-hating figurehead Saucy Nancy, friend to Worzel Gummidge in Barbara Euphan Todd’s Worzel Gummidge and Saucy Nancy<\/strong> (1947). She introduces herself to John and Susan saying ‘I’m half a lady because I ain’t got no lower half’ (Gummidge considers her a ‘sea-scarecrow’). True to her epithet (used here in saucy<\/em>‘s first sense, ‘impertinent, rude’), she is also\u00a0given to spouting vaguely inappropriate sea-shanties at inconvenient times, the most telling of which suggests a lot about the relationship between sailor and figurehead:<\/p>\n

Nancy, Nancy, tickle me fancy,
\nHere we lift again \u2013
\nFurling jib to a lifting sea
\nAll together, and time by me
\nOr the girl in the stern my bride to be.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

All this has been diversionary (and, mayhap diverting), but where did the ship <\/em>go? Well, aside from the fact that the figurehead was in many cases working as a synecdoche for the ship<\/a> itself, it also serves as an illustration of the relationship between the sailor crew and the vessel’s ‘human’ side (which is almost always gendered female).<\/p>\n

Sail on, oh Ship of State<\/h3>\n

However, as of 1675, ship <\/em>had a further meaning, in figurative ‘application to the state’, an idea that goes back to Plato and Horace as a model of good government. Plato reckoned that a ship, being a complicated technical beast, required a competent ‘philosopher king’ at the helm, to avoid in-fighting and silliness among the crew (which would, inevitably, end in naval disaster). The idea was picked up<\/a> by Henry Longfellow<\/a> (1807-1882), but appears elsewhere as a figurative commonplace.<\/p>\n

It takes on a literal incarnation in modern times through flagship ocean liners, whose British incarnations are frequently feminized (Queen Mary 1 & 2, Queen Elizabeth 1 & 2). Here it is useful to compare the lexical-historical conception of queens<\/a> <\/em>and nannies<\/a> \u2013 as the devoted will remember, the latter acquired a specifically feminine connotation with the fussy behaviour of a state.<\/p>\n

So why is a ship <\/em>gendered female? Well, aside from the sea-faring gender-assumptions (mermaids, bare-breasted apparitions, and perhaps even the traditional association of women and moisture), there is also the fact of seaborne sexual frustration and resultant kind of genial misogyny of what is arguably a proto-pinup tradition. Perhaps the reason I could find no conclusive answer to this question is that each ship <\/em>is (traditionally) ‘manned’ by a consortium of sailors, all with different senses of humour.<\/p>\n

\"s<\/a><\/p>\n

NEXT WEEK: T is for Tea<\/strong><\/p>\n