The Gilmore Girls<\/strong>) don\u2019t have an awful lot in common with
the thirteenth century Beguines. Paris Geller, on the other hand \u2013
Rory Gilmore\u2019s nemesis, love rival, roommate, co-plotter and sometime
editor \u2013 also attracts ridicule as a young woman who presumes on the
privileges of widowhood.<\/p>\n
Her affair with her professor, the novelist Asher Fleming, is treated by
most people as a slightly tacky fling between a vain older man and a
naive young student. Whilst Paris drops broad hints to Rory about her
grand passion (\u201cMmm, I smell of pipe smoke…\u201d) it is made
pretty clear to the audience that Fleming regularly has casual affairs
with young women who take his course.<\/p>\n
When he dies suddenly (“When he…were you…?”
“No, Rory. This great man was not laid low by my vagina.”)
Paris goes into mourning, and is appalled that not enough notice is
being taken on campus. She takes it upon herself to hold a wake for
Fleming, complete with a stack of his last book and herself in dignified
black, holding court on the sofa.<\/p>\n
Though Paris is not treated as cruelly as Miss Havisham, her party is
marked out as the culmination of her grandiose ideas about her
relationship. Behaving as Asher\u2019s widow is another one of
Paris\u2019 obsessive eccentricities, and the scene is undercut by the
appearance of a beer keg in the background by two frat boys whom Rory
hurriedly shoos away.<\/p>\n
Paris may believe she is enabling the community to pay their proper
respects to a great man of letters, whose loss she inevitably feels most
keenly, but most of the people at the party think it\u2019s a kegger
thrown by some girl they\u2019ve never heard of.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s a funny sequence, and Paris is given an unexpected emotional
weight by Liza Weil, but the narrative makes it clear she is not
entitled to widowhood, and no-one grants it to her. Apart from Emily
Gilmore, admittedly, which does nothing to bolster Paris\u2019
cause.<\/p>\n
Funeral Blues<\/h2>\n
This tension between people who feel like widows, and the society
which refuses to legitimise their view of themselves, is given another
twist in the final example I\u2019d like to discuss: the speaker in
W.H. Auden\u2019s poem
Funeral Blues<\/strong>.<\/p>\n
Performed so memorably by John Hannah in
Four Weddings and A Funeral<\/strong>, the poem has become one
of the most famous and popular elegies in English. In its best
known version, the poem runs thus:<\/p>\n
Stop all the clocks, cut off the telephone,
\nPrevent the dog from barking with a juicy bone,
\nSilence the pianos and with muffled drum
\nBring
out the coffin, let the mourners come.<\/em><\/p>\n
Let aeroplanes circle moaning overhead<\/em>
\n
Scribbling on the sky the message He Is Dead,<\/em>
\n
Put crepe bows round the white necks of the public
doves,<\/em>
\n
Let the traffic policemen wear black cotton
gloves.<\/em><\/p>\n
He was my North, my South, my East and
West,<\/em>
\n
My working week and my Sunday rest,<\/em>
\n
My noon, my midnight, my talk, my
song;<\/em>
\n
I thought that love would last for ever:
I was wrong.<\/em><\/p>\n
The stars are not wanted now: put
out every one;<\/em>
\n
Pack up the moon and dismantle the
sun;<\/em>
\n
Pour away the ocean and sweep up
the wood.<\/em>
\n
For nothing now can ever come
to any good.<\/em><\/p>\n
There\u2019s a noticeable
shift between the second and
third verses in the
treatment of the death and
its consequences. From
demanding exaggerated
outward ceremonies to mark
the beloved\u2019s death,
the poem starts to imagine
in both more personal and
more cosmological
terms.<\/p>\n
If the first two verses
concentrate on the public
and social sphere (the area
in which widowhood is
bestowed and validated, as
we have seen), the latter
two are concerned with the
relationship of one
individual to the whole
universe, and how that has
been dislocated by another
person\u2019s death.<\/p>\n
In both there is an
anguished hyperbole, an
awareness of the discrepancy
between the speaker\u2019s
own feelings and the way the
rest of the world sees the
matter. The irony of the
lines about the pigeons and
the sun are directed
inwards, sketching the
speaker\u2019s recognition
of their lack of proportion
alongside a refusal to
countenance the idea that
proportion is possible any
more.<\/p>\n
In some ways, it captures
Olivia and Paris\u2019
situation from both their
own perspective and that of
the audience watching
them.<\/p>\n
That pivot didn\u2019t
always shift the poem in
this direction, however. The
verses were originally
composed for a play called
The Ascent of
F2<\/strong>, about a
climber who dies whilst
attempting a famously
dangerous mountain, having
been persuaded by the
prospect of public glory
and national pride. His
lover speaks the lines,
which share the first two
verses with the later
version, but then veer off
like this:<\/p>\n
Hold up your
umbrellas to keep off
the rain
\nFrom
Doctor Williams while
he opens a vein;
\nLife, he
pronounces, it is
finally extinct.
\nSergeant, arrest
that man who said he
winked!<\/em><\/p>\n
Shawcross will
say a few words
sad and
kind<\/em>
\n
To the weeping
crowds about the
Master-mind,<\/em>
\n
While Lamp
with a
powerful
microscope<\/em>
\n
Searches
their faces
for a sign
of
hope.<\/em><\/p>\n
And
Gunn, of
course,
will
drive a
motor-hearse:<\/em>
\n
None
could
drive
it
better,
most
would
drive
it
worse.<\/em>
\n
He\u2019ll
open
up
the
throttle
to
its
fullest
power<\/em>
\n
And
drive
him
to
the
grave
at
ninety
miles
an
hour.<\/em><\/p>\n
The
satire
here
is
more
obvious,
and
directly
develops
the
first
two
verses\u2019
slanted
glance
at
the
public
commemoration
of
a
death.
They\u2019re
more
clearly
about
the
uselessness
of
marking
someone\u2019s
funeral
with
great
pomp,
without
being
so
specific
about
the
internal
emotional
world
which
is
being
contrasted
with
those
rituals.<\/p>\n
Auden
reworked
the
poem
as
part
of
a
collection
of
cabaret
songs
for
the
singer
Heidli
Anderson.
I
find
it
difficult
to
read
Funeral
Blues<\/strong>,
in
the
light
of
its
earlier
appearance
(and
alongside
the
other
songs),
without
finding
an
implication
that
the
singer
is
mourning
a
dead
politician
she
had
an
affair
with.<\/p>\n
The
pivot
in
the
middle,
from
this
angle,
marks
the
shift
between
her
satirical
comments
on
the
grandiose
ceremonies
accorded
him,
and
her
insistence
that
the
person
he
really
mattered
to
won\u2019t
be
recognised
during
them.<\/p>\n
The
politics
of
widowhood<\/h2>\n
John
Hannah\u2019s
performance
of
the
poem
during
the
funeral
scene
of
Richard
Curtis\u2019
movie
brings
out
this
reading
strongly.
Putting
Funeral
Blues<\/strong>
in
the
mouth
of
a
gay
man
mourning
his
partner
shows
up
the
political
dimension
of
the
issue
of
who
is
regarded
as
someone\u2019s
“widow”.<\/p>\n
The
lines\u2019
scorn
for
the
rituals
and
regulations
of
public
grief
map
provocatively
across
the
character\u2019s
situation,
legally
barred
from
being
recognised
as
the
surviving
spouse.<\/p>\n
Anxieties
around
widowhood
\u2013
and
non-widowhood
\u2013
are
a
recurring
feature
of
literary
history,
taking
various
forms
but
often
expressing
the
fears
of
a
dominant
group
that
they
are
losing
the
ability
to
define
and
control
other
people\u2019s
identities.<\/p>\n
We
might
be
tempted
to
mock
the
anxiety
of
medieval,
early
modern
and
Victorian
societies
who
were
so
anxious
to
police
the
status
of
widowhood,
and
so
strenuously
exerted
cultural
authority
stop
people
whom
they
imagined
wanted
to
\u201cplay\u201d
at
being
widows.
But
there
are
articles
and
speeches
being
written
right
now
in
response
to
the
prospect
of
equal
marriage,
which
engage
repugnantly
in
the
same
task.<\/p>\n