{"id":13376,"date":"2013-03-27T11:00:28","date_gmt":"2013-03-27T11:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.badreputation.org.uk\/?p=13376"},"modified":"2013-03-27T12:20:16","modified_gmt":"2013-03-27T12:20:16","slug":"guest-post-lingerie-women-and-eroticism-a-brief-study-of-the-21st-century-agent-provocateur-woman-part-22","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/badreputation.org.uk\/2013\/03\/27\/guest-post-lingerie-women-and-eroticism-a-brief-study-of-the-21st-century-agent-provocateur-woman-part-22\/","title":{"rendered":"[Guest Post] Lingerie, Women and Eroticism: A Brief Study of the 21st Century Agent Provocateur Woman (Part 2\/2)"},"content":{"rendered":"
If it is understood that the dominant discourse still pertains to heterosexual and patriarchal ideologies, Agent Provocateur was certainly aiming to challenge this in 2008. The brochure for their Spring\/Summer collection that year contains many examples of non-heteronormative behaviour.<\/p>\n
There are also many examples of dominant female behaviour. Two women in bright coloured wigs and lingerie tie up and blindfold a clothed man on his knees. A man in underwear stands, with hands tied behind his back, displaying marks on his chest that suggest he has been struck by the riding crop held by the woman to his left. A handcuffed man is disrobed by a woman, whilst another woman records the scene using a professional video camera. A man lying restrained on a table, has his trousers unzipped by a lingerie-clad woman who is holding a glass of brandy and is staring directly at the viewer.<\/p>\n
In this image, the Agent Provocateur woman is powerful yet playful. She is passionate, determined to satisfy her own desires and, from the facial expressions depicted, is clearly enjoying herself. She is active, not passive, and has agency.<\/p>\n
However, in the 2012 brochure, the Agent Provocateur woman appears
to have little or no agency. She faces the camera as if directed to
by the photographer and is entirely the subject of the gaze \u2013
continually watching herself. This appears to be a return to the
woman John Berger describes in Ways of Seeing<\/strong><\/a>:<\/p>\n
She has to survey everything she is and everything she does
because how she appears to others, and ultimately how she
appears to men, is of crucial importance for what is normally
thought of as the success of her life.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
There is little or no resistance to dominant discourses in the
images contained within this brochure. All of the women appear
sexually available, but are inviting sex rather than pursuing
it. A woman stands in lingerie and heels next to a similarly
attired seated woman, both facing the viewer with their legs
apart. A woman kneels on a velvet chair, glancing over her
shoulder at the viewer, with her buttocks prominently
displayed. A woman in lingerie reclines on a chaise longue. A
seated woman with her legs apart, hand on hip, stares at the
viewer. There is no interaction between these women, even when
more than one appears in the same image. Their only purpose is
to invite the viewer\u2019s gaze.<\/p>\n
The importance of lingerie to most of our respondents is due
to the fact that this kind of garment enables them to
demonstrate that they can manage a modern femininity. By
adhering to a certain scheme of classification, they show
how they master their performance in different situations.
This confirms their
social self<\/em>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Their research suggests that presenting lingerie as
something to be enjoyed by the viewer rather than the
wearer would not appeal to women. Even if this is not
always true of women outside of their small study
sample, I would argue that the current representation of
the Agent Provocateur woman would therefore not appeal
to the customer the brand originally sought to
attract.<\/p>\n
To conclude, the Agent Provocateur woman\u2019s identity
is, like the identity of every woman, shaped by
discourse and the ideologies she is exposed to. If the
woman is surrounded by, and part of, discourse which
challenges what is currently dominant, she will herself
become part of a reverse discourse. Agent Provocateur
was originally conceived by Corr\u00e9 and Rees as a
celebration of femininity, and the initial
representation of the Agent Provocateur woman emphasised
the performativity of her gender and her rejection of
the patriarchal ideologies so often present in lingerie
advertising.<\/p>\n
Although the association between Agent Provocateur
lingerie and this playfully erotic yet not passive
lifestyle is purely arbitrary, it was exceedingly easy
for customers to see the brand\u2019s values and decide
whether or not they wished to adopt them. Through the
act of putting on this particular brand of quality
exotic lingerie, a customer would create her sense of
self, create her gender and transform her life into that
of the Agent Provocateur woman. All of this was
successfully conveyed in the promotional images and
advertising for the brand up until at least 2008.<\/p>\n
In looking at the differences between the images used to
promote the Spring\/Summer 2008 collection and those of
the Autumn\/Winter 2012 collection, it could be argued
that the sale of the brand to a multinational company
had an effect on how the Agent Provocateur woman was
represented. The brand\u2019s ideal woman appears to now
offer far less resistance to current discourses on
gender, sexuality and femininity than she did when
Corr\u00e9 and Rees first sought to use lingerie as a
way to disrupt and question the fashion status
quo.<\/p>\n
In expanding the market for the brand, the new owners
appear to be attempting to create erotic lingerie that
does not offend, thus diluting the original ethos of
Agent Provocateur. Perhaps it is the current discourse
which has changed, or maybe the Agent Provocateur woman
simply works with the current discourse rather than
against it? However, it could also be claimed that what
is considered to be erotic is entirely
subjective.<\/p>\n
\n