{"id":12991,"date":"2013-01-08T07:30:14","date_gmt":"2013-01-08T07:30:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.badreputation.org.uk\/?p=12991"},"modified":"2013-01-08T07:35:55","modified_gmt":"2013-01-08T07:35:55","slug":"guest-post-dd-and-who-its-packaged-for","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/badreputation.org.uk\/2013\/01\/08\/guest-post-dd-and-who-its-packaged-for\/","title":{"rendered":"[Guest Post] D&D, and Who It’s Packaged For"},"content":{"rendered":"
Dungeons and Dragons (D&D)<\/strong> is the single most
famous roleplaying game in the world, the route most people got
into roleplaying, and the flagship of the hobby. So it’s a
tragedy that the game is pushing away potential fans through
artwork and even game text that is overwhelmingly focused on one
customer demographic: white men.<\/p>\n Photo
via Flickr user Megan Knight
(http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/meganknight\/5497474167\/)<\/p><\/div>\n
That\u2019s a pretty provocative statement, right there. But
I\u2019m confident in making it, because the evidence is there
for anyone who wants to see it. You could start by flipping
open a copy of pretty much any D&D book and looking
through the artwork. See how many women and people of colour
you can find \u2013 and then see how many of them are
half-dressed or made to look weak or submissive.<\/p>\n
Actually, you don\u2019t need to, because someone already did
it for you. Anna Kreider reviewed the artwork in the D&D 4th
edition<\/a> books (specifically the
Dungeon Master\u2019s Guide<\/strong>,
Players Handbook<\/strong>,
Players Handbook 2<\/strong> and the
Adventurer\u2019s Vault<\/strong>) and rated the
images therein.<\/p>\n
Kreider\u2019s findings were striking \u2013 of the
40% or so of humans (and demi-humans) that were
depicted as female, well over a third hit each of
the measures she chose (being half-dressed or posed
in a sexually suggestive way, for instance).
Needless to say, the remaining 60% of images, the
ones which were of men, tended to be wearing more
clothes, in more active, non-sexual poses.<\/p>\n
It gets better, because Chris Van Dyke had a look at D&D from the
perspective of race<\/a>. He was able to find only
two examples of a non-white character in the core
books of all four numbered editions of D&D. That
means non-white folks are practically invisible in
D&D.<\/p>\n
Now, these findings are based on subjective
judgements. That\u2019s unavoidable, because things
like \u201csexually suggestive\u201d and
\u201cwhite\u201d can often only be judged
subjectively in artwork. You can go and judge for
yourself if you doubt their conclusions. But I think
if we\u2019re honest, these results only confirm
what most of us already knew from experience.<\/p>\n
It isn\u2019t the end of the world. I\u2019ve
enjoyed lots of pop culture replete with sexism. And
after all, it\u2019s only a fantasy! But then again,
shouldn\u2019t our fantasy worlds contain a richer
variety of creatures than real life? And what does
it say to potential new gamers if they can\u2019t
find a picture of someone like them anywhere in
these books? Is D&D really just a game about
white dudes slugging it out in a dungeon somewhere?
I don\u2019t think so.<\/p>\n
OK, so what to do about it? I love roleplaying, and
despite years of moaning about the mechanics, I
still love D&D. The fact that it\u2019s not
exactly a beacon of gender and racial equality is,
for me, an obstacle to be overcome rather than a
sign I should give up on the game altogether.<\/p>\n
It so happens that Wizards of the Coast<\/a> are
writing a new edition of D&D right now.
That\u2019s why I put together a petition calling on them to do
better<\/a>.<\/p>\n
If you\u2019ve read this far, maybe you agree with
me \u2013 and if so, it would be great if you went
and signed it<\/a>, and better yet
share it with your friends and encourage them to
sign too.<\/p>\n
The petition won\u2019t change anything in itself.
Wizards of the Coast could ignore it, and maybe they
will. But if they can see that there are hundreds of
gamers out there who want more than whitewash and
chainmail bikinis, maybe they\u2019ll respond. We
owe it to the hobby to give them a clear
message.<\/p>\n
<\/a>
\n