{"id":12314,"date":"2012-09-19T10:01:32","date_gmt":"2012-09-19T09:01:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.badreputation.org.uk\/?p=12314"},"modified":"2012-09-19T10:01:32","modified_gmt":"2012-09-19T09:01:32","slug":"pussy-riot-revisited","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/badreputation.org.uk\/2012\/09\/19\/pussy-riot-revisited\/","title":{"rendered":"Pussy Riot revisited"},"content":{"rendered":"
Since we first wrote on Pussy Riot back in February<\/a>, widespread attention has been given to the subsequent arrest, trial and imprisonment of three members of the group, while mass anti-government protest continues in Russia<\/a>. From the past few months of coverage and debate, here are just a few things which have interested me on the complexities of Pussy Riot\u2019s background and media presentation.<\/p>\n
This (mildly NSFW) video is \u043a\u0438\u0441\u044c\u044f \u0435\u0440\u0435\u0441\u044c (Heresy of Little Cats), by the Russian electro-punk band Barto:<\/p>\n
As a non-speaker of Russian who hasn\u2019t found the lyrics anywhere, I’m sure there’s a lot I\u2019m not getting, but I like the song, the band are pretty admirable<\/a>, and I like the video\u2019s satirical emphasis on the patriarchal intertwining of political and religious authorities \u2013 the formal alliance of Putin\u2019s government and the Russian Orthodox Church, making it possible for civil disobedience to be framed as blasphemy, was a point of contention highlighted by the Pussy Riot trial.<\/p>\n
As a matter of fact Pussy Riot, although calling themselves a punk-band and using the sign of punk in their performances, never belonged to the Russian punk scene. They consider themselves as art-actionists, clearly place themselves in the context of contemporary Russian actionism, quoting the names of Prigov, Brener, Kulik and other art-provocateurs of the 1990s.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
So Pussy Riot\u2019s frequently mentioned connection with riot grrrl has more to do with the latter\u2019s existence as a DIY subculture involving zines, art, d\u00e9tournement and activism, than with music alone. Which is fair enough; back in the 90s, one of the odder of Courtney Love\u2019s swipes at Kathleen Hanna, in fact, was that \u201cShe’s not really in a band… She’s a political activist who took a bunch of women’s studies classes.” On the subject of Pussy Riot, Hanna herself had this<\/a> to say:<\/p>\n
What if people all over the world started their own performance groups, bands, art collectives, etc\u2026 and called them things like Pussy Riot Olympia. Pussy Riot, Athens Greece, Pussy Riot Paris, etc\u2026.And maybe if this trial turns out as the prosecutors want it to, with the women getting at least 3 years, we all play benefits and go to Russia en masse under the banner that we are all Pussy Riot, Yoko Ono could be in Pussy Riot, Patti Smith could be wearing a mask next to a troupe of girls from Tennesee storming the Cathedral of Christ the Savior screaming \u201cWe are all Pussy Riot!!!\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
As I wrote in February, it makes sense to consider Pussy Riot in the context of the former Soviet Union\u2019s long and fascinating history<\/a> of political protest coalescing around avant garde<\/em> art and music, especially punk. The Western media, perhaps understandably, tended instead to present the band in more straightforward and simplistic terms \u2013 rendering them more comprehensible to a Western audience, sure, but often in a less than helpful manner. I\u2019d been hoping someone would pick up on the patronising and infantilising aspects of much of the media presentation of Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, Maria Alyokhina and Yekaterina Samutsevich, and, in this article<\/a>, Sarah Kendzior nails it:<\/p>\n
Imagine this: The three men sit in court, awaiting their verdict. The youngest, a experienced dissident described by the media as a \u201csultry sex symbol\u201d with \u201cAngelina Jolie lips\u201d, glances at his colleague, an activist praised by the Associated Press for his \u201cpre-Raphaelite looks\u201d. Between them sits a third man, whose lack of glamour has led the New Republic to label him \u201cthe brain\u201d and deem his hair a \u201cpoof of dirty blonde frizz\u201d. The dissidents \u2013 or \u201cboys\u201d as they are called in headlines around the world \u2013 have been the subject of numerous fashion and style profiles ever since they first spoke out against the Russian government. \u201cHe\u2019s a flash of moving color,\u201d the New York Times writes approvingly about their protests, \u201cnever an individual boy.\u201d If this sounds ridiculous, it should \u2013 and not only because I changed the gender\u2026 Pussy Riot identifies as feminist, but you would never know it from the Western media, who celebrate the group with the same language that the Russian regime uses to marginalize them. The three members of Pussy Riot are \u201cgirls\u201d, despite the fact that all of them are in their twenties and two of them are mothers. They are \u201cpunkettes\u201d, diminutive variations on a 1990s indie-rock prototype that has little resemblance to Pussy Riot\u2019s own trajectory as independent artists and activists.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Of course, as Kendzior also points out, Pussy Riot have far more pressing concerns than being mischaracterized in the press. But:<\/p>\n
Pussy Riot also tells us a lot about how we see non-Western political dissent in the new media age, and could suggest a habit of mischaracterizing their grave mission in terms that feel more familiar but ultimately sell the dissidents short: youthful rebellion, rock and roll, damsels in distress.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
A lot of this sentiment is familiar: an impulse to treat protest in which women, particularly young women, are prominent, as fun, flippant, and fundamentally unserious. It\u2019s the reverse of the censorious and sensationalist \u2018Rage of the Girl Rioters\u2019 response to the 2010 UK student protests. In the case of Pussy Riot, arguments for their sympathetic treatment are often explicitly predicated on the power imbalance involved \u2013 they are \u2018just\u2019 ordinary women (or indeed \u2018girls\u2019), what threat to the state can they possibly pose? \u2013 which surely entrenches the idea of women as both relatively powerless and harmless, rather than enabling any sort of feminist empowerment. Away from such frustrating portayals, however, there\u2019s something to be said for the earlier stages of Pussy Riot\u2019s trajectory, which offer examples both of how music can form part of a wider oppositional movement and for how women\u2019s protest can be collective and anonymous, with no need of iconic or martyred figureheads.<\/p>\n
And yes, I do realise this post can be summarised as: “Pussy Riot? Preferred their earlier work, before they got so commercial”. So it goes.<\/p>\n