{"id":11884,"date":"2012-08-20T07:00:10","date_gmt":"2012-08-20T06:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.badreputation.org.uk\/?p=11884"},"modified":"2012-09-26T11:45:08","modified_gmt":"2012-09-26T10:45:08","slug":"hopeless-reimantic-part-one-virginal-heroines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/badreputation.org.uk\/2012\/08\/20\/hopeless-reimantic-part-one-virginal-heroines\/","title":{"rendered":"Hopeless Reimantic Part 1: Virginal Heroines"},"content":{"rendered":"

For more about this series on Romance Novel Tropes, read Rei’s Hopeless Reimantic intro post<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

\n\u201cYou were a virgin, Jess.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cYes.\u201d This time she didn’t deny it. \u201cAnd the reason I was still a virgin was because you’re the only man I’ve ever wanted. I was never interested in anyone else. Even when I thought I hated you, I still didn’t want anyone else.\u201d<\/p>\n

– Bought: Destitute Yet Defiant<\/strong>, Sarah Morgan (Harlequin Mills & Boon Ltd, 2010)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I pretty much picked that first reference at random. Bought<\/strong><\/a> was the first Mills & Boon I ever actually purchased (I say purchased; at the time of writing it was still a free download on Amazon) and it was absolutely everything I thought a contemporary romance would be, so it holds a special, slightly nauseated place in my heart. It was a lucky choice, though, because a great deal of what I want to say about this trope is contained in this book.<\/p>\n

\"Cover<\/a>

My first romance novel. I promise it\u2019s cheesy in a whole different way than it looks.<\/p><\/div> The virginal heroine trope is one that holds a great deal of interest for me. Bought<\/strong> is a pretty straightforward example of it \u2013 the heroine is a virgin who has never had eyes for anybody but the hero (and she’s twenty-two when the story takes place, taking this out of the believable realm of the adolescent crush), so not only is a sexual relationship with him her first experience of sex, it’s her first experience of emotional intimacy as well \u2013 and<\/em> there’s no mention throughout the book of her having any other friends, so her connection to him is pretty much her only in this world. Not even Fifty Shades of Grey<\/strong>, with its asexual-at-the-start heroine, sets the trope up so perfectly. (Yes, I have read the Fifty Shades<\/strong> trilogy. No, I’m not ready to talk about it yet.)<\/p>\n

There’s a lot of \u2013 entirely justifiable \u2013 outrage over how prevalent the virgin heroine is, even today. I am not<\/em> going to go into the whole problematic mess that is the idea that a woman’s ability to love truly and purely is somehow connected to her physical \u201cpurity\u201d, or the idea that a woman can only give herself fully to a lover \u2013 as if that’s a healthy focal point for a relationship anyway \u2013 if she’s unclaimed territory when the book begins, so to speak. (You would not believe how many romances I’ve beat myself over the head with in which the hero cries \u201cI can’t take this anymore! I don’t care if you were a dirty slutty hobag before we fell in love! I love you anyway! …wait, you were a virgin<\/em>? OH THANK GOD YOU BELONG ONLY TO ME NOW\u201d.)<\/p>\n

\"Pink<\/a>

This\u2019d be pretty much the standard response to non-virgins in many romance novels. Source: Smart Bitches Trashy Books, link at end of post<\/p><\/div>\n

Nor am I going to touch on the huge double standard that is the the common pairing of the virginal heroine with the Virile Manly Man, who has explored delightful bedroom adventures with many a lady fair \u2013 but still takes the heroine’s virginity as proof that she’s someone special. (But of course has nevertheless been totally respectful of all of his previous partners. Of course.<\/em>) I may write about them sometime, but this is an overview with a word limit, so I’ll put some further reading links at the bottom of the post and we can call it even for now.<\/p>\n

She spans all genres, does the virginal heroine (insert your own pun here. Yes, I said insert. No, I didn’t mean \u2013 look, just go and sit in the corner, okay?), and some are easier to deal with than others. The historical probably has the most easily explicable virgin heroine of all; it’s history! We know what women were like in history! Virgins were the most highly prized of all the ladies, weren’t they? Non-virgins were cast out and shunned and other antisocial-type punishments as well, and they would never marry, so any heroine worth her salt is going to have<\/em> to be a virgin, or she’s not going to be good enough for the hero. Duh. It’s historical accuracy! Everybody’s actions always correspond perfectly with prevalent attitudes of the time, didn’t you know that? The paranormal and fantasy genres get away with it pretty easily as well, often with some kind of mystical bond that predestines the two central characters for one another \u2013 although that doesn’t necessarily preclude one of the characters having had sexual relations beforehand. Sound like a contradiction? I don’t think it is \u2013 more on that in a moment.<\/p>\n

Which brings me neatly to the virgin heroine who gives me the most trouble; the contemporary one. This lady can be anyone, you guys. She’s a businesswoman or a hairdresser or a secretary or a recluse. She’s shy, or she’s loud and brash. But she always has this part of her that is…untouched, as it were, and I’ve seen authors who will write themselves around some pretty amazing corners to keep that so. She’s never found the right guy. She’s never experienced sexual desire before, or if she has it’s been fleeting or fumbling enough to ignore \u2013 this is overwhelmingly common<\/em>. Which brings me back to Bought<\/strong>, with its heroine who waited through an entire book for a hero she was never even really sure she wanted, because the true and deep love she felt for him superceded all other possible emotional connections.<\/p>\n

In some ways, it’s not just the heroine who gets this. A discussion on I (Heart) Presents<\/a> brought me this, from an interview with romance author Julia James:<\/p>\n

I must say, I\u2019ve done this several times, when the hero, realising the heroine is a virgin, goes to great lengths to ensure her first experience is really special, and, of course, in doing so, makes it really special for himself as well. In a way, she gives him her physical virginity, and in exchange he gives her his emotional virginity.
\n [Source]<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Smart Bitches, Trashy Books has its own epithet for the hero’s \u201cemotional virginity\u201d; they call it his coming into contact with the Magic Hoo-Hah. (The hero’s counterpart for this is the Mighty Wang, if anyone was interested.) The principle is pretty much the same; somehow, during sex, the hero and heroine exchange a piece of each other that nobody’s ever seen or touched before. And, because of the underpinning idea that men are physical creatures where women are emotional ones, that usually translates to the heroine being physically untouched before she meets the hero, and nobody ever having touched His Heart1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n

In a lot of ways it is this, more than a heroine’s physical virginity, that worries me about the trope as a whole. Because it’s been occurring to me more and more often than the virginal heroine does not necessarily need to be a virgin, per se; the second most commonly occurring version of this trope that I’ve read, usually in contemporaries, is one in which the heroine has<\/em> had sex. Not, in most cases, often \u2013 maybe once or twice, and always with the man she fancied herself in love with before she met the hero. But she didn’t really enjoy it; it was uncomfortable or even painful, and after that relationship ended she never really thought of doing it again, and she figured she’d never really understand what about it was so much fun.<\/p>\n

Even LGBT romance has its own version of this, in the form of the straight-person-turned-gay (rarely if ever is there a story of a straight person turning bi), who had sex \u2013 even lots of sex! – with the opposite gender, but never really experienced attraction before meeting their same-sex true love. Which is a plausible enough narrative, in fairness, but loses something in that the true love in question tends to be the only person our straight-turned-gay hero\/ine experiences any kind of attraction towards at all.<\/p>\n

I’ve seen justifications of this, and I can see why it’s popular. If romance is fantasy-fodder, what creates a more perfect fantasy than two people exploring new emotional ground together so that you, the reader, can vicariously experience all of that awe-struck joy and wonder? You only fall in love for the first time once, after all, and this creates a world in which the first time you experience this all-consuming emotion is also the only time. You wander into this amazing place, all innocence, and you are thrilled and delighted \u2013 and then you never have to leave again. What could be more perfect than that?<\/p>\n

Okay, who here has witnessed somebody they’re close to fall in love for the second (or third or fourth) time? And \u2013 and I’m aware that not everybody does this \u2013 who’s also seen them perform this amazing feat of selective memory, where suddenly their past relationships no longer really \u201ccount\u201d? Oh, sure, they’ll say, we had some good times, it was fun while it lasted, but it was never really all that \u2013 I always knew<\/em> something was missing. And now I’ve found it, because this \u2013 this<\/em> \u2013 is the real thing.<\/p>\n

Who’s seen that repeated over and over again through a cycle of partners?<\/p>\n

Because watching that happen? That’s the kind of feeling this trope gives me. I want to be happy that this kind of “mine is a love that I’ve never yet loved” tabula rasa brings happiness to people, but – I can’t. It kind of depresses me, if I’m honest. I’m more a believer in there being A One (or more than one One!) than there being The One, but I wasn’t always, and even when I wasn’t I’ve always kind of thought – so what if somebody’s not The One? Do they have to be secondhand? Even in Fantasyland, is it so important that every single other relationship a person has before they meet The One be denigrated like this? Even stories about a person loving again after they’ve lost a partner to death suffer from this kind of “it was never like this before, this person is touching a part of me that has never been touched” thing, bar a very rare few.<\/p>\n

There are exceptions to this, of course. I’m desperate to get my hands on A Gentleman Undone<\/strong><\/a> by Cecilia Grant, which unfortunately is only out in print, but features a courtesan heroine who actually enjoys sex,<\/em> even before she meets the hero. I recently read a pretty damned excellent book by Molly O’Keefe called Can’t Buy Me Love<\/strong><\/a>, whose hero and heroine are many things, but untouched ain’t one. In LGBT-ish fiction, and incidentally also one of the “very rare few” widower-whose-previous-relationship-meant-quite-a-bloody-lot books, Deirdre Knight’s Butterfly Tattoo<\/strong><\/a> has two people loving again without discounting their prior experience. And the hero’s bisexual. Right on.<\/p>\n

So that’s Virginal (Emotionally and Physically) Heroines (with the occasional Hero). Next up, I…haven’t actually decided what I’m covering yet! Enjoy the mystery.<\/p>\n

Further reading:<\/p>\n