Comments on: Hopeless Reimantic Presents: Anita Blake, Vampire Hunter (Part Two) /2013/12/05/hopeless-reimantic-presents-anita-blake-vampire-hunter-part-two/ A feminist pop culture adventure Tue, 31 Dec 2013 03:47:12 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.6 By: Cookie /2013/12/05/hopeless-reimantic-presents-anita-blake-vampire-hunter-part-two/#comment-139801 Tue, 31 Dec 2013 03:47:12 +0000 /?p=14176#comment-139801 Consider this comment dropped because I love this article.

]]>
By: Pet Jeffery /2013/12/05/hopeless-reimantic-presents-anita-blake-vampire-hunter-part-two/#comment-118917 Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:53:01 +0000 /?p=14176#comment-118917 In reply to Miranda.

Mina, I can only regard you with awe. You managed not only to read the whole of Varney, but to keep your critical faculties attuned throughout. Wow! I started reading Varney but, after a while, took to looking at the pictures, and skipping the text. Occasionally (but not often) a picture was sufficiently interesting for me to read a little bit to find out what was going on. I also read the ending to see whether it was as I’d heard. (“Crumbs!” was my reaction. “It really does end like that. Who’d have thought?”)

Rei and Miranda, thank you you for cluing me up on Twilight. I will freely admit to being fully half a century too old for Twilight. I hadn’t guessed that vampires could sink into such a debased form.

]]>
By: Ludi /2013/12/05/hopeless-reimantic-presents-anita-blake-vampire-hunter-part-two/#comment-118625 Fri, 06 Dec 2013 07:10:22 +0000 /?p=14176#comment-118625 I really, really like your conclusion in this piece, and it reminds me of a conversation about Fifty Shades (and I’m sure the trope comes up al over the place) about Gayle Rubin’s charmed circle – expanding the definitions of acceptable forms of sex just enough so that it can be presented as naughty and sexy, while reinforcing shutting out other unacceptable forms in comparison to make the mild stuff more palatable to the mainstream. Like assimilationism. Here’s the article about it that explains it better, if you like – http://sexgeek.wordpress.com/2012/09/20/crazy-and-criminal-on-those-damn-books-and-why-they-matter/

]]>
By: Nessical Ness /2013/12/05/hopeless-reimantic-presents-anita-blake-vampire-hunter-part-two/#comment-118190 Thu, 05 Dec 2013 18:33:17 +0000 /?p=14176#comment-118190 I have great swathes of respect for you after reading this, because your brain is still intact.

Marvellous article, I vote Jilly Cooper for the next lot of reading ;)

]]>
By: Miranda /2013/12/05/hopeless-reimantic-presents-anita-blake-vampire-hunter-part-two/#comment-118098 Thu, 05 Dec 2013 16:09:15 +0000 /?p=14176#comment-118098 In reply to Rei Hab.

I have always felt that the vamps in Twilight were presented much more like fae than undead. Edward and his ethereally pretty family come over more like a weird iteration of the Elfin Bridegroom trope than walking corpses.

]]>
By: Rei Hab /2013/12/05/hopeless-reimantic-presents-anita-blake-vampire-hunter-part-two/#comment-118095 Thu, 05 Dec 2013 16:00:59 +0000 /?p=14176#comment-118095 In reply to Mina Kelly.

I think Mina’s response to this comment is pretty much dead-on, Pet, but I will add this, just because you mentioned it: there’s not actually a lot of bloodsucking in Twilight. The vampire aspect of it honestly isn’t much of a feature at all until the fourth book (and even then, you could pretty much switch them out for any other paranormal creature you’ve authorially modified to be invincible, impossibly beautiful and sparkly).

]]>
By: Rei Hab /2013/12/05/hopeless-reimantic-presents-anita-blake-vampire-hunter-part-two/#comment-118091 Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:55:51 +0000 /?p=14176#comment-118091 In reply to Kirsty.

(And also, I really don’t think I’m in any position to judge anyone else’s choice of reading material. ;-))

]]>
By: Clouds /2013/12/05/hopeless-reimantic-presents-anita-blake-vampire-hunter-part-two/#comment-118090 Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:55:04 +0000 /?p=14176#comment-118090 I would really love to see you do a compare and contrast between this and the Canadian TV series Lost Girl. For the uninitiated, Lost Girl is a monster-of-the-week affair centring around a succubus PI, but it’s a lot more interesting and sensitively written in many ways than LKH.

]]>
By: Rei Hab /2013/12/05/hopeless-reimantic-presents-anita-blake-vampire-hunter-part-two/#comment-118089 Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:54:08 +0000 /?p=14176#comment-118089 In reply to Mina Kelly.

To be perfectly honest with you, I found some of the earlier books kind of boring. This is maybe because I’m not that big on detective novels; I did enjoy the “monster of the week” setup to an extent, but…well, I think part of it might have been that, as I said above, I was reading them all at once, and they all have a very similar structure. After the first couple that started to drag.

Yeah, I think that was what ultimately left me with a bad taste in my mouth about the books. I think the author sees them as major gamechangers in paranormal romance, but they’re really not.

]]>
By: Rei Hab /2013/12/05/hopeless-reimantic-presents-anita-blake-vampire-hunter-part-two/#comment-118084 Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:46:54 +0000 /?p=14176#comment-118084 In reply to Kirsty.

Thanks! I’m really glad you enjoyed it.

I struggled with the repetitive nature of the books as well; in perfect fairness to LKH, I think part of the reason it hit me especially hard is that I was reading a lot of books from a long-running series back to back, which I feel is kind of similar to marathoning a TV show that used to run once a week and getting annoyed by all the mandatory bits of set-up they do at the beginning of each episode because you’re seeing them all at once. She doesn’t half lay it on thick, though. And after a while there are just no new characters anymore. Maybe that would have bothered me less if I’d read each book as it was released, though. I guess I feel like in a long-running series the repetitive setup serves a purpose at the point of publication, but it doesn’t really reward back-to-back reading.

Yes, Anita Blake is a complete hypocrite. She’s…I don’t know, a lot about her rubs me up the wrong way. I’m totally fine with characters who just aren’t very nice people, but she’s so…*smug* about it.

]]>