Comments on: An Alphabet of Feminism #26: Z is for Zone /2011/04/18/an-alphabet-of-feminism-26-z-is-for-zone/ A feminist pop culture adventure Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:52:03 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.6 By: Pet Jeffery /2011/04/18/an-alphabet-of-feminism-26-z-is-for-zone/#comment-1174 Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:52:03 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1451#comment-1174 In reply to Pet Jeffery.

How about a picture illustrating a word you decided (at a late date) not to include? That way, you wouldn’t need to create a fresh illustration.

]]>
By: Pet Jeffery /2011/04/18/an-alphabet-of-feminism-26-z-is-for-zone/#comment-1173 Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:48:47 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1451#comment-1173 In reply to Pet Jeffery.

I’ve been wondering when an ideal of size 8-10 started.

I’m a fan of the Busby Berkeley musicals of the early to mid 1930s. Anyone who has seen these films (or even clips from them) will recall that they involve a large number of (mostly female) dancers. While none of the hoofers are overweight (dancing is, after all, an activity that burns off calories) many of them look (to my eye) more than a size 10. In fact, re-watching the dance routines (it’s probably not what one will notice on a first viewing) it has often occurred to me that there are plenty of body shapes on view that twenty-first century Hollywood would certainly reject. Body shape fascism is clearly growing more tyrannical.

Susie Orbach pointed out that fat is a feminist issue, but the prevailing tyranny debars women who are certainly not fat. Many women are well above size 10 without carrying any excess weight.

]]>
By: A Feminist Ideography « The Disorder Of Things /2011/04/18/an-alphabet-of-feminism-26-z-is-for-zone/#comment-1172 Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:48:24 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1451#comment-1172 […] Z is for Zone: […]

]]>
By: Pet Jeffery /2011/04/18/an-alphabet-of-feminism-26-z-is-for-zone/#comment-1171 Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:21:47 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1451#comment-1171 In reply to Hodge.

I think the size 8-10 thing has to do with the youthful ideal (which is imposed more upon women than upon men)… the idea that to be beautiful it is necessary to appear young. (Companies that make products to combat the appearance of aging must make a lot of money from this.) Specifically on size 8-10, my feeling is that it is natural for women to reach (at least) size 12 during their twenties.

]]>
By: Pet Jeffery /2011/04/18/an-alphabet-of-feminism-26-z-is-for-zone/#comment-1170 Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:09:48 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1451#comment-1170 In reply to Hodge.

That is bizarre!

]]>
By: Hodge /2011/04/18/an-alphabet-of-feminism-26-z-is-for-zone/#comment-1169 Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:40:01 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1451#comment-1169 In reply to Pet Jeffery.

Bizarrely hadn’t occurred to me. Perhaps there will be.

]]>
By: Hodge /2011/04/18/an-alphabet-of-feminism-26-z-is-for-zone/#comment-1168 Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:37:57 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1451#comment-1168 In reply to Pet Jeffery.

I think most conceptions of beauty boil down to people wanting what they can’t have, really.

Although I have to say I think the size 0 thing is different, because it’s completely sexless.

Indeed, I’ve lost count of the number of times some male has thumped the table in a pub and cried out some variant of ‘BUT WHY CAN’T WOMEN SEE THAT BEING SIZE 0 THIN JUST ISN’T ATTRACTIVE’.

Um… it’s not all about you, sunshine.

While, of course, there’s still a requirement for women to be thin, i’d estimate most average people would put the ideal at around size 8-10, which still accommodates a reasonable amount of junk in the trunk.

]]>
By: Pet Jeffery /2011/04/18/an-alphabet-of-feminism-26-z-is-for-zone/#comment-1167 Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:50:34 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1451#comment-1167 I wonder whether there will be a picture for next week’s post mortem and, if so, what it will depict.

]]>
By: Pet Jeffery /2011/04/18/an-alphabet-of-feminism-26-z-is-for-zone/#comment-1166 Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:48:31 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1451#comment-1166 While Egyptian iconography usually depicted Nut as a naked woman arched over the earth, like many Egyptian deities, she could also be shown as an animal. In Nut’s case, the animal was a sow. The stars were her piglets, to which she gave birth in the evening… and then devoured. Depicted as a woman, she devoured the sun in the evening, then gave birth to it in the morning. Some images show the sun moving through her body during the night. Nut was very much about devouring and giving birth.

]]>
By: Pet Jeffery /2011/04/18/an-alphabet-of-feminism-26-z-is-for-zone/#comment-1165 Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:39:11 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1451#comment-1165 The medieval period is a part of history I’ve never felt moved to study in depth. I was interested and intrigued to learn that medieval women padded their bellies. Compared with modern ideas, this demonstrates how arbitrary and socially determined standards beauty are. I suppose that the medieval idea was to emphasise a woman’s fertility. A remarkable contrast to today’s size zero supermodel ideals for womanhood.

]]>