Comments on: An Alphabet of Feminism #25: Y is for Yes /2011/04/11/an-alphabet-of-feminism-25-y-is-for-yes/ A feminist pop culture adventure Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:21:45 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.6 By: Pet Jeffery /2011/04/11/an-alphabet-of-feminism-25-y-is-for-yes/#comment-1021 Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:21:45 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1449#comment-1021 In reply to Hodge.

Do ferrets root? Somehow, the verb seems too benign, too herbivorous, for the activity of ferrets.

]]>
By: Hodge /2011/04/11/an-alphabet-of-feminism-25-y-is-for-yes/#comment-1020 Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:17:50 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1449#comment-1020 In reply to luce.

ferret go go go

]]>
By: luce /2011/04/11/an-alphabet-of-feminism-25-y-is-for-yes/#comment-1019 Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:30:15 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1449#comment-1019 Oh and I do rather think there is a proto indo european connection here. I’m going to have a ferret around in my books and root it out xx

]]>
By: luce /2011/04/11/an-alphabet-of-feminism-25-y-is-for-yes/#comment-1018 Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:29:03 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1449#comment-1018 Bless their souls. Actually don’t for they should have all stayed in one place making my revision of the greek dialects altogether less frustrating.

]]>
By: Hodge /2011/04/11/an-alphabet-of-feminism-25-y-is-for-yes/#comment-1017 Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:36:03 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1449#comment-1017 In reply to luce.

Of course! That was where I first saw it. AND THUS THE SEEDS OF THIS POST WERE SOWN.

The online etymology dictionary seems to be using ‘ge’ and ‘ye’ interchangeably (anglo saxon style), making it a firmly anglo saxon word, but there have been lots of examples (eg ‘girl’) where a saxon origin seems to have a weird connection with similar words in latin or greek. They got around, no? xxx

]]>
By: luce /2011/04/11/an-alphabet-of-feminism-25-y-is-for-yes/#comment-1016 Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:15:41 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1449#comment-1016 Hodge, do you remember I had a postcard of that vd poster on my teenage bedroom wall? (spot now occupied by l for lady. Natch).

Etymologically do you think yes is related to greek (and indeed indo european) ge (land, mother)?? Potentially very spurious but could be forced to work linguistically? Xxxxx

]]>
By: Pet Jeffery /2011/04/11/an-alphabet-of-feminism-25-y-is-for-yes/#comment-1015 Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:23:30 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1449#comment-1015 I notice that Joyce’s cardinal points of the female body include neither the mouth (with which to say ‘yes’ or ‘no’) nor the brain (with which to decide). I am reminded of the post on ‘Infant’. http://www.badreputation.org.uk/2010/11/29/an-alphabet-of-femininism-9-i-is-for-infant/

]]>
By: Hodge /2011/04/11/an-alphabet-of-feminism-25-y-is-for-yes/#comment-1014 Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:41:20 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1449#comment-1014 In reply to Pet Jeffery.

I really like Ulysses, but don’t understand it, which (sadly) makes me less enthusiastic than I feel I should be.

]]>
By: Pet Jeffery /2011/04/11/an-alphabet-of-feminism-25-y-is-for-yes/#comment-1013 Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:29:15 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1449#comment-1013 In reply to Miranda.

My response to that, Miranda, is “yeah, whatever”.

I think that Joyce is one of those authors one will never read unless one tackles him in one’s twenties. Now in my sixties, I’m content that I’ll never read him. I’d rather read Noel Streatfeild, and watch Xena DVDs.

Kafka is another author one will never read unless one tackles him in one’s twenties. I did read Kafka in my twenties. I was the only person I knew to think that “Amerika” was his best novel. I also thought that “The Hobbit” was better than “The Lord of the Rings”. There may have been no hope for me, even in my twenties!

]]>
By: Russell /2011/04/11/an-alphabet-of-feminism-25-y-is-for-yes/#comment-1012 Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:49:21 +0000 http://www.badreputation.org.uk/?p=1449#comment-1012 Regarding the Old English origins of the word as “Gise” or “Gese”, while there is probably no real etymological link, I am reminded of the Irish word “geis” or “geas”, being a sort of magical unbreakable vow with terrible consequences, or a kind of taboo. So in one sense both the ultimate “yes” and the ultimate “no” as both a positive and negative obligation.

In fact, given the etymology you give above Hodge, I wonder if there’s not a link? “So be it” would certainly appear to apply to the Irish “geas” as aptly as the English word “yes”.

]]>