Thank you for correcting the O’Sullivan link!
The first piece of nose art on that page (“Baby”) connects neatly with the “infant” entry in this alphabet.
]]>Ooh that’s interesting, I wonder if it’s a Plato thing…
]]>I think Larkin is dryly commenting on this in ‘Next, Please’ (which is also relevant in that it features a figurehead with boobs out):
http://bit.ly/ijRrsQ
One of those is still wrong. I think the apostrophe is to blame.
]]>Returning to sexualised images, the general idea of ship’s figureheads seems present in aircraft nose art: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nose_art. See these, http://www.nose-art.net/O'Sullivan.htm for example. I think that aircraft, as well as, ships have often been referred to as “she”. And I’ve met people who call their cars “she”.
Here’s another idea, off the top of my head — could a ship be “she” because she carries the sailors like so many foetuses in her womb?
]]>